Skip to content

[ISSUE #2782]🔨Update automerge.yml #2783

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025
Merged

[ISSUE #2782]🔨Update automerge.yml #2783

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

SpaceXCN
Copy link
Collaborator

@SpaceXCN SpaceXCN commented Mar 21, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2782

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Adjusted the automated merge process so that pull requests marked as ready for review no longer trigger an automatic merge, ensuring a more controlled and predictable merging workflow.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Mar 21, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Mar 21, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@SpaceXCN 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 27.63%. Comparing base (207a285) to head (ff40109).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2783   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.63%   27.63%           
=======================================
  Files         526      526           
  Lines       77784    77784           
=======================================
  Hits        21495    21495           
  Misses      56289    56289           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request removes the ready_for_review event from the pull_request_target trigger in the GitHub Actions automerge workflow configuration. This adjustment ensures that the automerge job is not triggered when a pull request is marked as ready for review, while retaining the remaining event types (labeled, unlabeled, synchronize, and opened). No changes were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Summary
.github/workflows/automerge.yml Removed the ready_for_review event from the pull_request_target trigger, so that automerge runs only for other specified events.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Auto as Automerge Job

    PR->>GH: Trigger event via pull_request_target
    alt Event is ready_for_review
        GH-->>GH: Do not trigger automerge job
    else Other events (labeled, unlabeled, synchronize, opened)
        GH->>Auto: Trigger automerge job
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update automerge workflow trigger configuration (#2782)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

approved

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • rocketmq-rust-bot
  • mxsm

Poem

I'm a little rabbit with a curious vibe,
Hopping through code changes, my ears alive.
Skipping "ready_for_review" like a carrot in a row,
Automerge now flows as smoothly as a bow.
Celebrating each PR with a twitch and a hop—what a show!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 207a285 and ff40109.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/automerge.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/automerge.yml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mxsm mxsm merged commit 57df0e4 into mxsm:main Mar 21, 2025
23 of 25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Update automerge.yml
4 participants