Skip to content

[ISSUE #2455]💫Add print string for AckMessageProcessor handle code not supporting🥅 #2456

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 31, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2455

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling and logging for unsupported request codes in the message acknowledgment processor.
    • Enhanced debugging capabilities by adding more context to error logs.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing the error handling and logging capabilities of the AckMessageProcessor in the RocketMQ broker implementation. Specifically, the changes modify the process_request method to introduce more detailed error logging when encountering unsupported request codes. The modification provides additional context by logging the request code and the consumer's remote address, improving debugging capabilities without altering the core functionality of returning an unsupported request response.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs Enhanced error handling with additional logging for unsupported request codes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add print string for unsupported handle code [#2455]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 In the realm of RocketMQ's code,
A processor's log now brightly glowed
With errors clear and context bright
Debugging becomes a pure delight!
Unsupported codes shall now reveal
Their secrets with a digital seal 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs (1)

105-120: LGTM! Enhanced error logging improves debugging capabilities.

The added error logging provides valuable context by including both the request code and consumer's remote address. This will help in debugging unsupported request code scenarios.

A minor suggestion to improve the error message consistency:

-                    "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode: {}, consumer: {} ",
+                    "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode {:?}, consumer: {}",
-                            "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode: {:?}",
+                            "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode {:?}, consumer: {}",
-                            request_code
+                            request_code, channel.remote_address()

This change makes the error message in the response consistent with the logged error message, providing the same level of detail in both places.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ada834 and f7197f9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.63%. Comparing base (9ada834) to head (f7197f9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...etmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.63%   28.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         510      510              
  Lines       73497    73501       +4     
==========================================
  Hits        21044    21044              
- Misses      52453    52457       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 01318f1 into main Jan 31, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 31, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the op-2455 branch February 1, 2025 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Add print string for AckMessageProcessor handle code not supporting
3 participants