-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
[ISSUE #2455]💫Add print string for AckMessageProcessor handle code not supporting🥅 #2456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the error handling and logging capabilities of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs (1)
105-120
: LGTM! Enhanced error logging improves debugging capabilities.The added error logging provides valuable context by including both the request code and consumer's remote address. This will help in debugging unsupported request code scenarios.
A minor suggestion to improve the error message consistency:
- "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode: {}, consumer: {} ", + "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode {:?}, consumer: {}", - "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode: {:?}", + "AckMessageProcessor failed to process RequestCode {:?}, consumer: {}", - request_code + request_code, channel.remote_address()This change makes the error message in the response consistent with the logged error message, providing the same level of detail in both places.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/ack_message_processor.rs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2456 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 28.63% 28.63% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 510 510
Lines 73497 73501 +4
==========================================
Hits 21044 21044
- Misses 52453 52457 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #2455
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit