[ISSUE #2372]👻Channel add send method🚀 #2373
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new asynchronous Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
auto merge
ready to review
waiting-review
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
rocketmq-rust-bot,
SpaceXCN and
TeslaRustor
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs (2)
248-255: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.The error handling logic is duplicated across
send,send_one_way, andsend_wait_response. Consider extracting the common pattern into a private helper method.Here's a suggested refactor:
+ async fn send_internal( + &mut self, + request: RemotingCommand, + response_tx: Option<tokio::sync::oneshot::Sender<Result<RemotingCommand>>>, + timeout_millis: Option<u64>, + ) -> Result<()> { + if let Err(err) = self.tx.send((request, response_tx, timeout_millis)).await { + error!("send request failed: {}", err); + return Err(ChannelSendRequestFailed(err.to_string())); + } + Ok(()) + } + pub async fn send(&mut self, request: RemotingCommand) -> Result<()> { let request = request.mark_oneway_rpc(); - if let Err(err) = self.tx.send((request, None, None)).await { - error!("send request failed: {}", err); - return Err(ChannelSendRequestFailed(err.to_string())); - } - Ok(()) + self.send_internal(request, None, None).await }
248-255: Consider renaming for clarity.The method name
sendis quite generic. Consider a more descriptive name that better reflects its fire-and-forget nature, distinguishing it fromsend_one_way.Suggested alternatives:
send_fire_and_forgetsend_without_timeoutsend_async_one_way
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
| pub async fn send(&mut self, request: RemotingCommand) -> Result<()> { | ||
| let request = request.mark_oneway_rpc(); | ||
| if let Err(err) = self.tx.send((request, None, None)).await { | ||
| error!("send request failed: {}", err); | ||
| return Err(ChannelSendRequestFailed(err.to_string())); | ||
| } | ||
| Ok(()) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation for the new send method.
The new method lacks documentation explaining its purpose, behavior, and how it differs from send_one_way. Consider adding a doc comment that includes:
- Purpose of the method
- Explanation of one-way RPC behavior
- Difference from
send_one_way - Error conditions
Add documentation like this:
+ /// Sends a one-way RPC command without waiting for a response and without a timeout.
+ ///
+ /// Unlike `send_one_way`, this method doesn't require a timeout parameter, making it
+ /// suitable for fire-and-forget scenarios where timing isn't critical.
+ ///
+ /// # Arguments
+ /// * `request` - The command to send
+ ///
+ /// # Returns
+ /// * `Ok(())` if the send was successful
+ /// * `Err(ChannelSendRequestFailed)` if the send operation failed
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ /// ```no_run
+ /// # use rocketmq_remoting::RemotingCommand;
+ /// # async fn example(mut channel: Channel) -> Result<()> {
+ /// let command = RemotingCommand::new();
+ /// channel.send(command).await?;
+ /// # Ok(())
+ /// # }
+ /// ```
pub async fn send(&mut self, request: RemotingCommand) -> Result<()> {|
|
||
| pub async fn send(&mut self, request: RemotingCommand) -> Result<()> { | ||
| let request = request.mark_oneway_rpc(); | ||
| if let Err(err) = self.tx.send((request, None, None)).await { | ||
| error!("send request failed: {}", err); | ||
| return Err(ChannelSendRequestFailed(err.to_string())); | ||
| } | ||
| Ok(()) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The review comment is correct - the send method lacks test coverage
The verification confirms there are no tests for the send method:
- No unit tests in the test module of
channel.rs - No integration tests in the codebase
- No tests covering this functionality anywhere else
Tests should be added to verify:
- Successful send operation
- Error handling for failed sends
- One-way RPC marking behavior
🔗 Analysis chain
Add tests for the new send method.
The new method lacks test coverage. Consider adding tests that verify:
- Successful send operation
- Error handling for failed sends
- One-way RPC marking
Let's verify the test coverage:
Would you like me to generate comprehensive test cases for the new method?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any tests for the new send method
rg -B 2 -A 2 'fn.*test.*send' rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for test module in channel.rs
echo "=== Checking for test module in channel.rs ==="
rg "#\[cfg\(test\)\]" rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs -A 5
echo -e "\n=== Checking for separate test files ==="
fd "test.*\.rs" rocketmq-remoting/
echo -e "\n=== Checking for specific test files containing 'channel' ==="
fd "channel.*test.*\.rs|test.*channel.*\.rs" rocketmq-remoting/
echo -e "\n=== Checking content of src directory for test organization ==="
ls -R rocketmq-remoting/src/
Length of output: 7096
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for integration tests
echo "=== Checking for integration tests ==="
fd "integration.*test.*\.rs|test.*integration.*\.rs" rocketmq-remoting/
ls -la rocketmq-remoting/tests 2>/dev/null || echo "No tests directory found"
# Check if send method is tested anywhere in the codebase
echo -e "\n=== Checking for any tests using send method ==="
rg "test.*send.*\{" rocketmq-remoting/ -A 5
Length of output: 411
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2373 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 28.65% 28.64% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 507 507
Lines 73251 73259 +8
==========================================
Hits 20988 20988
- Misses 52263 52271 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #2372
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit