Skip to content

[ISSUE #2203]💫Implement select_mapped_buffer and select_mapped_buffer_with_position method🍻 #2204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 11, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2203

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new methods for selecting mapped buffers, enhancing access to file data.
  • Refactor

    • Updated mapped file buffer selection methods to improve file data access.
    • Simplified method signatures for mapped file operations.
    • Enhanced tracking of mapped file references in buffer selection results.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved buffer selection logic to handle edge cases more robustly.
  • Chores

    • Removed deprecated method implementations.
    • Updated method signatures across multiple components.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the RocketMQ storage module, focusing on enhancing the mapped file handling mechanisms. The changes primarily involve updating the MappedFile trait and DefaultMappedFile implementation to provide more flexible methods for selecting and accessing mapped file buffers. The modifications include adding new methods select_mapped_buffer and select_mapped_buffer_with_position, removing previous Arc-based methods, and updating related implementations in CommitLog and ConsumeQueue to leverage these new methods.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/commit_log.rs - Updated get_message and get_data_with_option methods to use new mapped buffer selection methods
- Added tracking of mapped_file in result objects
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs - Added new methods select_mapped_buffer and select_mapped_buffer_with_position
- Removed Arc-based selection methods
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs - Renamed select_mapped_buffer_size to select_mapped_buffer
- Added select_mapped_buffer_with_position method
- Updated commit method to use unimplemented!()
rocketmq-store/src/queue/single_consume_queue.rs - Updated get_index_buffer and correct_min_offset to use new mapped buffer selection methods

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement select_mapped_buffer [#2203]
Implement select_mapped_buffer_with_position [#2203]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 Mapped files dancing light,
Buffers selected with delight,
Rust's magic weaves its spell so bright,
Selecting data, pure and tight,
A rabbit's code takes joyful flight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a427bd and 5e8c1cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/commit_log.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/queue/single_consume_queue.rs (4 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 11, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 11, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 43 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.73%. Comparing base (ebcce97) to head (5e8c1cd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs 0.00% 23 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-store/src/queue/single_consume_queue.rs 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/commit_log.rs 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2204      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.74%   28.73%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         498      498              
  Lines       71077    71091      +14     
==========================================
  Hits        20430    20430              
- Misses      50647    50661      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1)

705-719: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.

The implementation is clean and thread-safe with proper atomic operations. However, it would benefit from documentation explaining the relationship with select_mapped_buffer.

Add documentation explaining:

  • When to use this vs select_mapped_buffer
  • The meaning of the return value's fields
  • Thread safety guarantees
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6174edd and 8a427bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/commit_log.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/queue/single_consume_queue.rs (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (6)
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1)

497-515: Verify the impact of removing mapped_file reference.

The implementation sets mapped_file: None in the result, which might affect callers expecting a valid reference. Additionally, the change from Arc<Self> to &self could impact thread safety.

Run this script to find potential unsafe usages:

rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs (1)

178-205: LGTM! Well-documented trait methods.

The new trait methods are clearly documented with their purpose, parameters, and return values. The documentation helps users understand when to use each method.

rocketmq-store/src/log_file/commit_log.rs (2)

283-287: LGTM! Proper mapped file tracking.

The changes correctly update the mapped file reference in the result, maintaining the connection between the buffer and its source file.


1135-1139: LGTM! Consistent mapped file handling.

The changes maintain consistency with the get_message method in how mapped files are tracked in the result.

rocketmq-store/src/queue/single_consume_queue.rs (2)

340-345: LGTM! Proper buffer selection with position.

The implementation correctly uses the new position-based buffer selection and maintains the mapped file reference.


639-645: LGTM! Consistent buffer selection.

The implementation maintains consistency with other changes in how mapped buffers are selected and tracked.

Comment on lines +490 to +493
unimplemented!(
// need to implement
"commit"
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Implement commit functionality before deployment.

The commit function is marked as unimplemented, which will cause runtime panics. This is a breaking change from the previous implementation that returned 0.

This functionality needs to be implemented before the code can be deployed to production. Consider either:

  1. Implementing the commit functionality, or
  2. Maintaining the previous behavior of returning 0 until the new implementation is ready

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Implement select_mapped_buffer and select_mapped_buffer_with_position method
3 participants