Skip to content

[ISSUE #2192]💫ADefaultMappedFile implement rename_to🍻 #2193

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 10, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2192

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved file renaming functionality with proper error handling and file path management.
  • Refactor

    • Enhanced implementation of file renaming method to provide more robust file operations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request implements the rename_to method for the DefaultMappedFile struct in the RocketMQ store module. Previously a placeholder (todo!()), the new implementation provides a functional method to rename files associated with a DefaultMappedFile instance. The method constructs a new file path, attempts to rename the existing file, and updates the internal file references, with appropriate error handling to return a boolean indicating the success of the renaming operation.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs - Added use std::path::Path import
- Implemented rename_to method with file renaming logic and error handling

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement rename_to for DefaultMappedFile [#2192]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-store crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 A file's new name, a rabbit's delight,
Renaming with code, oh so bright!
From todo!() to logic so clear,
RocketMQ's storage, now without fear!
Hop, hop, rename away! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 10, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (2)

223-236: Add documentation for the rename_to method.

The method lacks documentation about its behavior, parameters, return value, and possible failure cases. Consider adding comprehensive documentation.

Add this documentation above the method:

/// Renames the mapped file to the specified name and updates internal state.
///
/// # Arguments
///
/// * `file_name` - The new name for the file
///
/// # Returns
///
/// Returns `Ok(())` if the rename operation succeeds, or an error if:
/// * The file couldn't be renamed
/// * The renamed file couldn't be reopened
/// * The memory mapping couldn't be updated
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This operation is not atomic. If the file is successfully renamed but
/// reopening fails, the internal state may become inconsistent.

223-236: Consider making the rename operation atomic.

The current implementation has a critical window where the file is renamed but the internal state is inconsistent. Consider implementing a more atomic approach:

  1. Create a new file with the target name
  2. Copy the content
  3. Swap the files
  4. Clean up the old file

Would you like me to provide a more detailed implementation for this atomic approach?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8decb3 and 68ae34c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1)

22-22: LGTM!

The Path import is correctly added and necessary for the file renaming functionality.

Comment on lines +223 to +236
let new_file = Path::new(file_name);
match std::fs::rename(self.file_name.as_str(), new_file) {
Ok(_) => {
self.file_name = CheetahString::from(file_name);
match fs::File::open(new_file) {
Ok(new_file) => {
self.file = new_file;
}
Err(_) => return false,
}
true
}
Err(_) => false,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling and logging.

The current implementation silently discards error details. Consider:

  1. Logging the error details for debugging
  2. Returning a Result type instead of bool to provide more context about failures

Here's a suggested improvement:

-    fn rename_to(&mut self, file_name: &str) -> bool {
+    fn rename_to(&mut self, file_name: &str) -> std::io::Result<()> {
         let new_file = Path::new(file_name);
-        match std::fs::rename(self.file_name.as_str(), new_file) {
-            Ok(_) => {
-                self.file_name = CheetahString::from(file_name);
-                match fs::File::open(new_file) {
-                    Ok(new_file) => {
-                        self.file = new_file;
-                    }
-                    Err(_) => return false,
-                }
-                true
-            }
-            Err(_) => false,
+        std::fs::rename(self.file_name.as_str(), new_file).map_err(|e| {
+            error!("Failed to rename file from {} to {}: {}", self.file_name, file_name, e);
+            e
+        })?;
+        
+        self.file_name = CheetahString::from(file_name);
+        self.file = fs::File::open(new_file).map_err(|e| {
+            error!("Failed to open renamed file {}: {}", file_name, e);
+            e
+        })?;
+        
+        // Update memory mapping
+        self.mmapped_file = unsafe {
+            MmapMut::map_mut(&self.file).map_err(|e| {
+                error!("Failed to remap file {}: {}", file_name, e);
+                e
+            })?
         }
+        Ok(())
     }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.


💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Path traversal vulnerability confirmed in rename_to method

The codebase lacks path validation mechanisms, making the rename_to method vulnerable to path traversal attacks. The method directly uses the input file name without:

  • Validating against directory traversal sequences (../, ./)
  • Ensuring the target path remains within allowed directories
  • Canonicalizing or normalizing the path
🔗 Analysis chain

Add input validation to prevent path traversal attacks.

The current implementation doesn't validate the input file name, which could allow path traversal attacks. Consider adding validation to ensure the new path is within the expected directory.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any existing path validation functions in the codebase
rg -A 5 'fn.*validate.*path'

Length of output: 30


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for path-related security checks and manipulations
rg -i "path|canonicalize|normalize" --type rust -A 3

# Look for any security-related functions
ast-grep --pattern 'fn $FUNC($$$) {
  $$$
  path$$$
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 66107

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit a2f8e21 into main Jan 10, 2025
24 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 10, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.74%. Comparing base (b8decb3) to head (68ae34c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2193      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.75%   28.74%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         498      498              
  Lines       71059    71069      +10     
==========================================
  Hits        20430    20430              
- Misses      50629    50639      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] DefaultMappedFile implement rename_to
3 participants