Skip to content

[ISSUE #2111]🏗️BrokerInner add mut methods⚡️ #2112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 6, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2111

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added multiple mutable accessor methods to the BrokerInner struct
    • Introduced new methods for flexible manipulation of broker internal state
    • Enabled direct mutable access to various broker configuration and management components

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive set of mutable accessor methods for the BrokerInner<MS> struct in the RocketMQ broker runtime. The changes add approximately 32 new methods that provide mutable references to various internal components and configuration fields of the broker, such as message store, configuration managers, services, and runtime flags. These methods enhance the flexibility of accessing and modifying the broker's internal state while maintaining encapsulation.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs Added 32 new pub fn *_mut() methods to BrokerInner<MS> struct, enabling mutable access to various internal fields and components

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
[#2111] Add mutable methods to BrokerInner

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 Mutable methods, oh what delight!
Broker's inner secrets now in sight
Rust's power unleashed with each new key
Flexibility dancing, wild and free
CodeRabbit hops with glee! 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Jan 6, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 109 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.01%. Comparing base (7bf541d) to head (59a4bba).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs 0.00% 109 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2112      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.05%   28.01%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         493      493              
  Lines       70722    70831     +109     
==========================================
  Hits        19843    19843              
- Misses      50879    50988     +109     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (4)

192-195: Encourage Rust doc comments
Adding /// doc comments describing the purpose and usage of this function can improve maintainability.


202-205: No immediate issues; missing doc comments
Implementation is correct. Consider adding doc comments to guide usage.


212-215: Maintain consistent doc comments
Keep function documentation consistent across all newly added mutable getters.


227-230: Expand usage instructions
If consumer_filter_manager is used concurrently, consider an explanatory doc comment about concurrency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bf541d and 59a4bba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (29)
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (29)

187-190: Consider concurrency safety for direct mutable references
Returning a mutable reference is straightforward. However, be mindful of concurrent access in multi-threaded scenarios. Ensure the BrokerInner<MS> is not shared across threads without proper synchronization.


197-200: Consistent naming and behavior
The method name _mut is consistent with the other newly introduced mutable accessors. No functional issues noted.


207-210: Good use of #[inline]
This function is trivial and inlining can be beneficial. No issues found.


217-220: Thread safety caution
Exposing a mutable reference to consumer_offset_manager is valid, but ensure concurrency constraints are clearly documented or enforced in higher layers.


222-225: No issues
Granting mutable access to the subscription_group_manager is straightforward. No concerns raised.


232-235: Nothing problematic
Method logic is correct for returning a mutable handle to consumer_order_info_manager.


237-240: Option wrapping
Ensure callers handle the None case properly when attempting mutable access on message_store.


242-245: Proper usage of Option
Likewise, confirm that the potential None in broker_stats is safely handled.


247-250: Schedule message service mutation
Straightforward direct reference. No immediate issues.


252-255: Check for timer feature toggles
Returning a mutable reference to timer_message_store is fine; ensure the feature gating or usage for timer_message_store is consistent.


257-260: No issues
Implementation is concise and consistent with other getters.


262-265: Producer manager mut
Approach is consistent with the rest of the accessors. No concerns.


267-270: No concerns
This mutable accessor for consumer_manager follows the established pattern.


272-275: Nothing special
Implementation is correct. Ensure concurrency is handled in upstream usage.


277-280: Check usage
This allows mutating broker_stats_manager; ensure you do not introduce data races or partial updates.


282-287: Option return
Proceed with caution if the TopicQueueMappingCleanService field is None. Implementation is otherwise correct.


289-292: Boolean mutation
No issues, but be mindful of concurrency if multiple threads are toggling this.


294-297: Atomic usage
The function returns a mutable reference to an atomic type. Typically, we mutate an AtomicU64 via inherent methods (e.g., fetch_add). Exposing a full mutable reference is unusual but not incorrect.


299-302: Similarly for is_isolated
Returning &mut AtomicBool deviates from normal usage of AtomicBool methods. Confirm that external code usage is safe.


304-307: Retrieving Option
Check for None usage at call sites.


309-312: Straightforward
No issues noted for rebalance_lock_manager_mut.


314-317: BrokerMemberGroup mutation
No concerns. The approach is consistent with other methods.


319-324: Feature gating
The returned service is optional. Ensure gating remains consistent.


326-331: Check usage
Ensure the code handles the possibility of missing transactional_message_check_listener.


333-338: Transactional message check
Again, watch for None values on access.


340-345: TransactionMetricsFlushService
No direct concerns. Keep concurrency considerations in mind if this is mutated in multiple threads.


347-350: TopicRouteInfoManager
No issues. Straight access to an Arc-managed field.


352-355: EscapeBridge
Implementation is matched; ensure no unguarded concurrency usage.


357-360: PopInflightMessageCounter
Implementation is straightforward. Confirm concurrency constraints.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request rocketmq-broker crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] BrokerInner add mut methods
3 participants