-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
[ISSUE #1935]🏗️Set up tui basic development framework🚀 #1936
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request sets up the basic development framework for a RocketMQ Terminal User Interface (TUI) application. The changes include updating the workspace and Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1936 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 28.50% 28.49% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 484 485 +1
Lines 67924 67939 +15
==========================================
Hits 19362 19362
- Misses 48562 48577 +15 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs (2)
17-19
: Question the necessity of allowing dead code and unused identifiers.
It might be best to remove these allow attributes after initial development to maintain code cleanliness. Continuously allowing them could hide potential issues and reduce maintainability.
28-33
: Ensure robust error handling around terminal initialization and restoration.
Consider adding a message or fallback logic if terminal setup fails, especially for environments lacking terminal capabilities.rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (1)
24-36
: Combine impl blocks for clarity.
While splitting them works, combining them can improve discoverability of methods on this struct.impl RocketmqTuiApp { pub fn new() -> Self { Self { should_quit: false } } pub fn should_quit(&self) -> bool { self.should_quit } pub fn quit(&mut self) { self.should_quit = true; } -} - -impl RocketmqTuiApp { pub async fn run(mut self, mut terminal: DefaultTerminal) -> anyhow::Result<()> { Ok(()) } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Cargo.toml
(1 hunks)rocketmq-tui/Cargo.toml
(2 hunks)rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs
- rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs
🔇 Additional comments (5)
rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs (1)
21-22
: Modules are well-organized.
Defining separate modules for application logic and UI helps keep the code organized and improves maintainability.
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (1)
19-22
: Good use of a separate struct for application state.
Keeping the application’s quit flag in a dedicated structure is a clean approach.
rocketmq-tui/Cargo.toml (2)
3-3
: Workspace-based metadata is a neat approach.
Adopting workspace-level metadata keeps versioning consistent across packages.
15-22
: Align library versions with the rest of the workspace.
Ensure that the pinned versions (like "0.29.0" for ratatui) match any constraints or feature requirements. Periodically revisit to maintain compatibility.
Cargo.toml (1)
62-62
: anyhow version bumped to 1.0.95.
Confirm this upgrade does not affect existing error-handling semantics. Generally safe, but still merits a quick check.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any potential impacts of the anyhow version upgrade by checking its usage in the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about anyhow's usage in the codebase.
Anyhow 1.0.95 upgrade appears safe to proceed
The codebase uses anyhow in a straightforward manner with standard error handling patterns:
- Basic error creation with
anyhow!
macro - Standard
Result<T, anyhow::Error>
return types - Simple error type imports (
use anyhow::Error
)
These are stable features that haven't changed semantically across 1.0.x versions. The usage patterns found in the codebase don't rely on any deprecated or changed functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for anyhow usage patterns in the codebase
rg "use anyhow::" -A 2
# Search for Result type with anyhow::Error
rg "Result<.*, anyhow::Error>" -A 2
# Search for anyhow macro usage
rg "(anyhow!|bail!|ensure!)" -A 2
Length of output: 2706
impl RocketmqTuiApp { | ||
pub async fn run(mut self, mut terminal: DefaultTerminal) -> anyhow::Result<()> { | ||
Ok(()) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement core loop or event handling in the run method.
Currently this method returns immediately without handling any input events or drawing UI components.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1935
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
RocketmqTuiApp
to manage application state.search_input_widget
module for better code organization.SearchInputWidget
structure for future UI enhancements.Dependency Updates
anyhow
dependency version.rocketmq-tui
package.rocketmq-rust
,ratatui
, andcrossterm
.Documentation