Skip to content

[ISSUE #1935]🏗️Set up tui basic development framework🚀 #1936

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 23, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1935

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new asynchronous main function for enhanced application functionality.
    • Added a foundational structure for RocketmqTuiApp to manage application state.
    • Created a new search_input_widget module for better code organization.
    • Introduced the SearchInputWidget structure for future UI enhancements.
  • Dependency Updates

    • Updated anyhow dependency version.
    • Transitioned to workspace-based versioning for rocketmq-tui package.
    • Added new dependencies: rocketmq-rust, ratatui, and crossterm.
  • Documentation

    • Included licensing comment blocks in new modules.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request sets up the basic development framework for a RocketMQ Terminal User Interface (TUI) application. The changes include updating the workspace and rocketmq-tui Cargo configuration to use workspace-based versioning, adding new dependencies like ratatui and crossterm, and creating the initial structure for the TUI application. The main changes involve creating a new application structure with a RocketmqTuiApp and preparing the groundwork for a terminal-based interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
Cargo.toml Updated anyhow dependency version to 1.0.95
rocketmq-tui/Cargo.toml - Switched to workspace-based versioning
- Added rocketmq-rust, ratatui, and crossterm dependencies
- Updated dependency configurations
rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs - Converted main to async function
- Added rocketmq::main annotation
- Initialized terminal and RocketmqTuiApp
- Added new module declarations
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs - Created RocketmqTuiApp struct
- Implemented basic application lifecycle methods
- Added run method for application execution
rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs Added search_input_widget module declaration
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs Created SearchInputWidget structure

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Set up TUI basic development framework

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-tui crate

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor
  • RocketmqRustBot

Poem

🚀 A Rabbit's TUI Tale 🐰

In terminal's glow, a new app takes flight,
RocketMQ's interface, shining so bright
Widgets and structs, all neatly aligned
A coding adventure, brilliantly designed!
Hop, hop, hooray for the TUI's debut! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.49%. Comparing base (4339248) to head (28f7d2a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1936      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.50%   28.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         484      485       +1     
  Lines       67924    67939      +15     
==========================================
  Hits        19362    19362              
- Misses      48562    48577      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs (2)

17-19: Question the necessity of allowing dead code and unused identifiers.
It might be best to remove these allow attributes after initial development to maintain code cleanliness. Continuously allowing them could hide potential issues and reduce maintainability.


28-33: Ensure robust error handling around terminal initialization and restoration.
Consider adding a message or fallback logic if terminal setup fails, especially for environments lacking terminal capabilities.

rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (1)

24-36: Combine impl blocks for clarity.
While splitting them works, combining them can improve discoverability of methods on this struct.

 impl RocketmqTuiApp {
     pub fn new() -> Self {
         Self { should_quit: false }
     }

     pub fn should_quit(&self) -> bool {
         self.should_quit
     }

     pub fn quit(&mut self) {
         self.should_quit = true;
     }

-}
-
-impl RocketmqTuiApp {
     pub async fn run(mut self, mut terminal: DefaultTerminal) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
         Ok(())
     }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4339248 and 28f7d2a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs
  • rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs
🔇 Additional comments (5)
rocketmq-tui/src/main.rs (1)

21-22: Modules are well-organized.
Defining separate modules for application logic and UI helps keep the code organized and improves maintainability.

rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (1)

19-22: Good use of a separate struct for application state.
Keeping the application’s quit flag in a dedicated structure is a clean approach.

rocketmq-tui/Cargo.toml (2)

3-3: Workspace-based metadata is a neat approach.
Adopting workspace-level metadata keeps versioning consistent across packages.


15-22: Align library versions with the rest of the workspace.
Ensure that the pinned versions (like "0.29.0" for ratatui) match any constraints or feature requirements. Periodically revisit to maintain compatibility.

Cargo.toml (1)

62-62: anyhow version bumped to 1.0.95.
Confirm this upgrade does not affect existing error-handling semantics. Generally safe, but still merits a quick check.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for any potential impacts of the anyhow version upgrade by checking its usage in the codebase.


Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about anyhow's usage in the codebase.

Anyhow 1.0.95 upgrade appears safe to proceed
The codebase uses anyhow in a straightforward manner with standard error handling patterns:

  • Basic error creation with anyhow! macro
  • Standard Result<T, anyhow::Error> return types
  • Simple error type imports (use anyhow::Error)

These are stable features that haven't changed semantically across 1.0.x versions. The usage patterns found in the codebase don't rely on any deprecated or changed functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for anyhow usage patterns in the codebase
rg "use anyhow::" -A 2

# Search for Result type with anyhow::Error
rg "Result<.*, anyhow::Error>" -A 2

# Search for anyhow macro usage
rg "(anyhow!|bail!|ensure!)" -A 2

Length of output: 2706

Comment on lines +38 to +42
impl RocketmqTuiApp {
pub async fn run(mut self, mut terminal: DefaultTerminal) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement core loop or event handling in the run method.
Currently this method returns immediately without handling any input events or drawing UI components.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit b15d30f into main Dec 23, 2024
24 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 23, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-1935 branch December 24, 2024 07:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. rocketmq-tui crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Set up tui basic development framework
4 participants