Skip to content

[ISSUE #1727]🍻Add PopBufferMergeService struct for rust 🚀 #1728

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 12, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1727

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new module for processing services, enhancing the existing functionality.
    • Added a PopBufferMergeService struct to manage pop buffer operations with a placeholder method for future implementation.
  • Documentation

    • Included licensing information for new modules under the Apache License, Version 2.0.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new module named processor_service in the rocketmq-broker/src/processor.rs file and a new module pop_buffer_merge_service within it. Additionally, a new struct PopBufferMergeService is defined in rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs, which includes a method add_ack that is currently unimplemented. The modifications focus on expanding the modular structure without altering existing functionality or processing logic.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/processor.rs Added module: pub(crate) mod processor_service;
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service.rs Added module: pub(crate) mod pop_buffer_merge_service;
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs Added struct: pub(crate) struct PopBufferMergeService and method: pub fn add_ack(&mut self, _revive_qid: i32, _ack_msg: AckMsg)

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Convert PopBufferMergeService java class to rust (#1727)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

In the burrow deep, where the code does play,
A new service hops in, brightening the day.
With buffers to merge and requests to cheer,
Our rabbit team works, spreading joy far and near!
So let’s code and create, with a hop and a bound,
For the magic of modules is where fun is found! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 12, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.98%. Comparing base (b5e8c78) to head (0d19956).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ssor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1728      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   27.98%   27.98%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         465      466       +1     
  Lines       63996    63998       +2     
==========================================
  Hits        17911    17911              
- Misses      46085    46087       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs (1)

22-26: Add documentation for the PopBufferMergeService implementation

Please add documentation comments explaining:

  • The purpose of the PopBufferMergeService
  • The functionality of the add_ack method
  • Parameter descriptions
  • Return value expectations (if any)
  • Any error conditions

Example:

/// Service responsible for merging pop buffers in the broker.
pub(crate) struct PopBufferMergeService;

impl PopBufferMergeService {
    /// Adds an acknowledgment message to be processed for the given revival queue ID.
    ///
    /// # Arguments
    /// * `revive_qid` - The revival queue identifier
    /// * `ack_msg` - The acknowledgment message to be processed
    ///
    /// # Returns
    /// (Document expected return behavior)
    pub fn add_ack(&mut self, revive_qid: i32, ack_msg: AckMsg) {
        // Implementation here
    }
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 23-24: rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs#L23-L24
Added lines #L23 - L24 were not covered by tests

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5e8c78 and 0d19956.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service.rs
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs

[warning] 23-24: rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs#L23-L24
Added lines #L23 - L24 were not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs (2)

20-20: Verify if fields are missing from the struct definition

The struct is currently defined as an empty unit struct, but since this is a port from a Java class, it likely needs fields to maintain state for buffer merging operations.


22-26: ⚠️ Potential issue

Implementation and tests needed for add_ack method

The method is currently marked as unimplemented. As this is a port from Java, we should implement the equivalent functionality and add comprehensive tests.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 23-24: rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs#L23-L24
Added lines #L23 - L24 were not covered by tests

Comment on lines +23 to +24
pub fn add_ack(&mut self, _revive_qid: i32, _ack_msg: AckMsg) {
unimplemented!("Not implemented yet");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add test coverage for the PopBufferMergeService

The static analysis indicates missing test coverage. Please add unit tests to verify the behavior of the add_ack method.

Would you like me to help generate a test module with basic test cases? This could include:

  • Test for successful acknowledgment
  • Test for invalid revival queue ID
  • Test for error conditions
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 23-24: rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs#L23-L24
Added lines #L23 - L24 were not covered by tests

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit b7e3e16 into main Dec 12, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 12, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-1727 branch December 13, 2024 03:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add PopBufferMergeService struct for rust
4 participants