-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
[ISSUE #1648]🚀Add ConsumeRequest for ConsumeMessagePopConcurrentlyService🔥 #1663
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily enhance the asynchronous capabilities of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1663 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 27.55% 27.51% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 468 468
Lines 62668 62745 +77
==========================================
Hits 17267 17267
- Misses 45401 45478 +77 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs (1)
Line range hint
1233-1234
:change_pop_invisible_time_async
is UnimplementedThe method
change_pop_invisible_time_async
is currently unimplemented, which will cause a panic if called during execution.Please provide an implementation for
change_pop_invisible_time_async
to ensure that the asynchronous change of the message's invisible time functions correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs
(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (1)
1233-1234
: change_pop_invisible_time_async
is Unimplemented
This method remains unimplemented, mirroring the issue identified earlier. Calling this method without an implementation will result in a runtime panic.
let delay_second = if delay_level as usize > delay_level_table.len() { | ||
delay_level_table[delay_level_table.len() - 1] | ||
} else { | ||
delay_level_table[delay_level as usize] | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential Index Out-of-Bounds Error when Accessing delay_level_table
There is a risk of an index out-of-bounds error when accessing delay_level_table
with delay_level
as the index. If delay_level
is negative, casting it to usize
can result in a large positive number, causing a panic at runtime.
To prevent this, ensure that delay_level
is validated and clamped within the valid range before using it as an index. Here's a suggested fix:
let delay_second = if delay_level < 0 || delay_level as usize >= delay_level_table.len() {
delay_level_table[delay_level_table.len() - 1]
} else {
delay_level_table[delay_level as usize]
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
let delay_second = if delay_level as usize > delay_level_table.len() { | |
delay_level_table[delay_level_table.len() - 1] | |
} else { | |
delay_level_table[delay_level as usize] | |
}; | |
let delay_second = if delay_level < 0 || delay_level as usize >= delay_level_table.len() { | |
delay_level_table[delay_level_table.len() - 1] | |
} else { | |
delay_level_table[delay_level as usize] | |
}; |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1648
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes