Skip to content

[ISSUE #1607]♻️Remove Rebalance trait useless method remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue_pop🔥 #1608

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 6, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1607

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method for handling pop pull requests, marked for future implementation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed the method for handling unnecessary pop message queues, streamlining message queue management.
  • Chores

    • Updated the RebalanceLocal and RebalancePushImpl structures to reflect the removal of outdated methods.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the removal of the remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue method from the RebalanceLocal trait and the RebalancePushImpl struct within the RocketMQ client codebase. This alteration signifies a shift in how unnecessary pop message queues are managed. Additionally, a new method signature for dispatch_pop_pull_request has been introduced in RebalancePushImpl, although its implementation is pending. The overall structure and functionality of the remaining methods in both files remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance.rs Removed method: remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue from RebalanceLocal trait.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_push_impl.rs Removed method: remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue from RebalancePushImpl struct. Added method signature: async fn dispatch_pop_pull_request.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue method from trait (1607)
Remove remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue method from struct (1607)

Suggested labels

refactor, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the code where queues once lay,
A method gone, we've cleared the way.
With traits refined and structs anew,
The pop requests await their due.
Hop along, let's code and play! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96b0ed9 and 45cd4a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance.rs (0 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_push_impl.rs (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance.rs
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_push_impl.rs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.49%. Comparing base (96b0ed9) to head (45cd4a9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1608   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   25.49%   25.49%           
=======================================
  Files         459      459           
  Lines       60607    60601    -6     
=======================================
  Hits        15451    15451           
+ Misses      45156    45150    -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge refactor♻️ refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Refactor♻️]Remove Rebalance trait useless method remove_unnecessary_pop_message_queue_pop
4 participants