Skip to content

[ISSUE #1460]🔥Add macro for create client error🚀 #1461

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 30, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1460

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new macro, mq_client_err!, to simplify error handling by streamlining the creation of MQClientError instances.
  • Tests

    • Added three new test cases to validate the functionality of the mq_client_err! macro, ensuring correct error message formatting and response code assignment.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new macro, mq_client_err!, in the rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs file. This macro simplifies the creation of MQClientError instances by providing two forms: one for specifying a response code and a message, and another that defaults the response code to -1. Additionally, three new test cases are added to verify the macro's functionality, ensuring it formats error messages correctly and assigns appropriate response codes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs Added macro mq_client_err! for creating MQClientError instances; added three test cases.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add macro for create client error (#1460)

Poem

🐰 In the code where errors dwell,
A macro springs, all is well!
With mq_client_err! so bright,
Error handling feels just right.
Three tests to guard, they stand tall,
In our code, we’ll never fall! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Nov 30, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.65517% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.28%. Comparing base (5ffc5b4) to head (5ccf5bd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs 89.65% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1461      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   22.24%   22.28%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         450      450              
  Lines       57982    58011      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits        12899    12925      +26     
- Misses      45083    45086       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs (3)

144-157: Add documentation for the macro

The macro implementation looks good, but it would benefit from documentation explaining its usage patterns and examples.

Add documentation like this:

+/// Creates a MQClientError with optional response code and formatted message.
+/// 
+/// # Examples
+/// 
+/// ```
+/// // With response code and formatted message
+/// let err = mq_client_err!(404, "Resource {} not found", "users");
+/// 
+/// // With just error message
+/// let err = mq_client_err!("Operation failed");
+/// ```
 #[macro_export]
 macro_rules! mq_client_err {

151-151: Make the error path more explicit

The error construction could be more explicit about the types being used.

Consider this improvement:

-        std::result::Result::Err($crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientErr( ClientErr::new_with_code($response_code as i32, formatted_msg)))
+        std::result::Result::Err($crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientErr(
+            $crate::client_error::ClientErr::new_with_code($response_code as i32, formatted_msg)
+        ))

204-243: Add more test coverage for edge cases

The current tests cover the basic functionality well, but consider adding these test cases:

#[test]
fn mq_client_err_with_negative_response_code() {
    let result = mq_client_err!(-100, "Negative code: {}", "test");
    if let Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(err)) = result {
        assert_eq!(err.response_code(), -100);
    }
}

#[test]
fn mq_client_err_verifies_faq_url_attachment() {
    let result = mq_client_err!("test error");
    if let Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(err)) = result {
        // Verify the FAQ URL is properly attached to the message
        assert!(format!("{}", err).contains("FAQUrl"));
    }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ffc5b4 and 5ccf5bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs (2 hunks)

Comment on lines +144 to +157
// Create a macro to simplify error creation
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! mq_client_err {
// Handle errors with a custom ResponseCode and formatted string
($response_code:expr, $fmt:expr, $($arg:expr),*) => {{
let formatted_msg = format!($fmt, $($arg),*);

std::result::Result::Err($crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientErr( ClientErr::new_with_code($response_code as i32, formatted_msg)))
}};
// Handle errors without a ResponseCode, using only the error message
($error_message:expr) => {{
std::result::Result::Err($crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new($error_message)))
}};
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Consider migrating existing error creation patterns to use the new macro

The search results show extensive direct usage of ClientErr::new() and ClientErr::new_with_code() across the codebase that could benefit from the new macro:

  • Found ~60 instances of direct ClientErr::new() calls
  • Found ~25 instances of direct ClientErr::new_with_code() calls
  • Most usages follow patterns that match the macro's two variants:
    • Simple error messages: ClientErr::new("message")
    • Formatted messages with response codes: ClientErr::new_with_code(code, format!("msg {}", var))

Suggested locations to migrate:

  • rocketmq-client/src/base/validators.rs: Contains multiple simple error creations
  • rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/default_mq_producer_impl.rs: Has many formatted error messages
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs: Contains numerous error creations with formatting
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify existing error creation patterns

Let's check if there are existing error creation patterns that could be migrated to use this new macro.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find existing error creation patterns that could be migrated

# Look for direct ClientErr::new calls
echo "Finding direct ClientErr::new calls:"
rg "ClientErr::new\(" --type rust

# Look for direct ClientErr::new_with_code calls
echo -e "\nFinding direct ClientErr::new_with_code calls:"
rg "ClientErr::new_with_code\(" --type rust

# Look for MQClientError::MQClientErr construction
echo -e "\nFinding MQClientError::MQClientErr construction:"
rg "MQClientError::MQClientErr\(" --type rust

Length of output: 22690

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add macro for create client error
4 participants