[ISSUE #1445]🔨Update refactor.yml #1446
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the issue template located in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml (4)
22-31: LGTM! Consider adding markdown support hint.The conversion to textarea fields is perfect for capturing detailed problems and design considerations. To make these fields even more useful, consider adding a hint about markdown support.
- type: textarea attributes: label: "What problems does the refactor aim to solve?" - description: "List the issues, inefficiencies, or code smells being addressed." + description: "List the issues, inefficiencies, or code smells being addressed. Markdown is supported."
34-37: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description for issue linking.The textarea allows listing multiple related issues, which is great. Consider clarifying that GitHub will automatically link issues when using the
#notation.- type: textarea attributes: label: "Is there a related issue or PR?" - description: "Link to any related GitHub issues or pull requests that are part of the refactor." + description: "Reference related GitHub issues or pull requests using # notation (e.g., #123). Multiple references are supported."
40-48: LGTM! Consider adding code review checklist items.The conversion to checkboxes and the verification steps are well thought out. Consider adding items specific to code review preparation:
- type: checkboxes attributes: label: "Checklist" options: - "Ensure the refactor does not introduce new bugs" - "Update unit tests if applicable" - "Ensure the refactor does not negatively impact performance" - "Document any new patterns or architecture changes" - "Test the refactor in different environments (e.g., staging, production)" + - "Prepare before/after code comparisons for review" + - "Update relevant documentation"🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 48-48: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Line range hint
1-48: Consider implementing template versioning.The template improvements are valuable for capturing detailed refactoring requirements. To track future template evolution and maintain backward compatibility with existing issues, consider adding a version field.
name: Code Refactor about: Template for creating issues related to code refactoring +version: '1.1.0' title: '[Refactor♻️]short description of the refactor'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 48-48: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml
[error] 48-48: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml (1)
16-19: LGTM! Good improvement to the input field.
Converting to textarea allows users to provide more detailed information about the scope of refactoring, which is crucial for complex changes involving multiple files or modules.
| attributes: | ||
| label: "Checklist" | ||
| options: | ||
| - "Ensure the refactor does not introduce new bugs" | ||
| - "Update unit tests if applicable" | ||
| - "Ensure the refactor does not negatively impact performance" | ||
| - "Document any new patterns or architecture changes" | ||
| - "Test the refactor in different environments (e.g., staging, production)" | ||
| - "Test the refactor in different environments (e.g., staging, production)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add newline at end of file.
Add a newline character at the end of the file to comply with YAML best practices.
- "Test the refactor in different environments (e.g., staging, production)"
+📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - "Test the refactor in different environments (e.g., staging, production)" | |
| - "Test the refactor in different environments (e.g., staging, production)" | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 48-48: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1445
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
These improvements facilitate clearer communication and more comprehensive submissions for code refactoring requests.