Skip to content

[ISSUE ##1330]🧪Add unit test for MessageModel #1331

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rust-learn-now
Copy link
Contributor

@rust-learn-now rust-learn-now commented Nov 26, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1330

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced a new test module for the MessageModel enum, enhancing test coverage for serialization, deserialization, and display functionalities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new test module for the MessageModel enum located in rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/message_model.rs. This module includes unit tests that validate serialization and deserialization functionalities using the serde_json library. Specifically, the tests cover the correct conversion of MessageModel variants to and from JSON strings, as well as verifying the output of the to_string method.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/message_model.rs Added a new test module with unit tests for serialization, deserialization, and display of MessageModel enum.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add unit test for MessageModel (#[1330])

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

approved, auto merge, testing, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the heart of code, a rabbit hops,
Testing each model, it never stops.
Serialization, deserialization, all in play,
Ensuring our enums work perfectly each day!
With JSON strings, they dance and twirl,
In the world of Rust, let the tests unfurl! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@rust-learn-now 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.06%. Comparing base (6284f3e) to head (8fdd637).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1331      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   19.99%   20.06%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         434      434              
  Lines       54638    54671      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits        10925    10971      +46     
+ Misses      43713    43700      -13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/message_model.rs (2)

99-145: Comprehensive test coverage with room for enhancement

The current test suite effectively covers the core functionality. Consider adding these additional test cases to enhance coverage:

  1. Test the Default trait implementation
  2. Add round-trip serialization tests
  3. Consider property-based testing using frameworks like proptest

Here's an example of the additional test cases:

#[test]
fn test_default_is_clustering() {
    assert_eq!(MessageModel::default(), MessageModel::Clustering);
}

#[test]
fn test_roundtrip_serialization() {
    let original = MessageModel::Broadcasting;
    let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&original).unwrap();
    let deserialized: MessageModel = serde_json::from_str(&serialized).unwrap();
    assert_eq!(original, deserialized);
}

// If you decide to add property-based testing:
// use proptest::prelude::*;
// proptest! {
//     #[test]
//     fn test_display_roundtrip(model in prop_oneof![
//         Just(MessageModel::Broadcasting),
//         Just(MessageModel::Clustering)
//     ]) {
//         let displayed = model.to_string();
//         let deserialized: MessageModel = serde_json::from_str(&format!("\"{}\"", displayed)).unwrap();
//         assert_eq!(model, deserialized);
//     }
// }

Line range hint 54-56: Fix incorrect error message in deserializer

The error message mentions "TopicFilterType" instead of "MessageModel", which appears to be a copy-paste error.

Apply this fix:

     fn expecting(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
-        formatter.write_str("a string representing TopicFilterType")
+        formatter.write_str("a string representing MessageModel")
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6284f3e and 8fdd637.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/message_model.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/heartbeat/message_model.rs (2)

93-98: LGTM! Well-structured test module

The test module follows Rust testing best practices with appropriate imports and module configuration.


93-145: ✅ PR objectives successfully met

The implemented test suite successfully addresses issue #1330 by providing comprehensive unit tests for the MessageModel component. The tests cover all critical functionality including serialization, deserialization, display formatting, and error handling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Unit Test🧪] Add unit test for MessageModel
3 participants