[ISSUE #1319]🔨Update Github Actions CI #1320
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request modifies several GitHub Actions workflow files to enhance formatting consistency, particularly regarding the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1320 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 19.82% 19.82%
=======================================
Files 434 434
Lines 54530 54530
=======================================
Hits 10810 10810
Misses 43720 43720 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/remove-label-on-approve.yml (1)
Line range hint
22-55: Consider improving label management robustnessWhile the label management logic is functional, consider these improvements for better maintainability and reliability:
script: | + // Define constants for label management + const LABELS = { + REMOVE: ['waiting-review', 'ready to review'], + ADD: ['approved', 'auto merge'] + }; + - const labelsToRemove = ['waiting-review','ready to review']; // Labels to remove // Get repository and PR context information const { owner, repo } = context.repo; const issue_number = context.payload.pull_request.number; // Get all labels on the current PR const { data: labels } = await github.rest.issues.listLabelsOnIssue({ owner, repo, issue_number, }); // Filter the labels that exist on the PR and are in the labelsToRemove list const existingLabelsToRemove = labels - .filter(label => labelsToRemove.includes(label.name)) + .filter(label => LABELS.REMOVE.includes(label.name)) .map(label => label.name); // Remove each label for (const label of existingLabelsToRemove) { await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({ owner, repo, issue_number, name: label, }); console.log(`Label '${label}' has been removed.`); } if (existingLabelsToRemove.length === 0) { console.log('No matching labels found to remove.'); } - github.rest.issues.addLabels({ + + // Verify labels exist before adding + try { + await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner, repo, issue_number, - labels: ['approved','auto merge'] + labels: LABELS.ADD }); + console.log('Successfully added labels:', LABELS.ADD); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error adding labels:', error); + }Changes suggested:
- Define constants for better maintainability
- Add error handling for label addition
- Improve logging
- Use consistent formatting
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.29.0-1)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/associate_milestone_issue.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/associate_milestone_pr.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/remove-label-on-approve.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/sync-issue-labels.yml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .github/workflows/associate_milestone_issue.yml
- .github/workflows/associate_milestone_pr.yml
- .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml
- .github/workflows/sync-issue-labels.yml
| @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| - name: Remove multiple labels using github-script | |||
| uses: actions/github-script@v7 | |||
| with: | |||
| github-token: ${{ secrets.BOT_TOKEN }} | |||
| github-token: ${{ secrets.BOT_TOKEN }} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Default GITHUB_TOKEN is sufficient for this workflow
The workflow only performs basic label operations (list, remove, add) on pull requests, which are well within the scope of the default GITHUB_TOKEN permissions. Using BOT_TOKEN is unnecessary as the default token has sufficient permissions for:
issues:read- for listing labelsissues:write- for removing and adding labels
The workflow should be updated to use github-token: ${{ github.token }} instead of the custom BOT_TOKEN to follow security best practices.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the necessity and permissions of BOT_TOKEN
Using a custom bot token instead of the default GITHUB_TOKEN could pose unnecessary security risks. The default GITHUB_TOKEN is preferred unless there's a specific need for elevated permissions.
Let's check the workflow's permission requirements:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the workflow requires elevated permissions that justify using BOT_TOKEN
# Check for API operations in workflow files that might require elevated permissions
rg -l 'github\.rest\.' .github/workflows/remove-label-on-approve.yml | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg 'github\.rest\.' "$file" -A 2 -B 2
done
Length of output: 857
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete workflow file to understand the full context and permissions
cat .github/workflows/remove-label-on-approve.yml
Length of output: 2086
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1319
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation