[ISSUE #1249]🍻Optimize RouteInfoManager logic #1250
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1250 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 18.26% 18.26%
=======================================
Files 428 428
Lines 53595 53581 -14
=======================================
Hits 9789 9789
+ Misses 43806 43792 -14 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (1)
Line range hint
183-399: Consider adding comprehensive test suite for string handling optimizations.The changes consistently optimize string handling across the codebase by:
- Reducing unnecessary string conversions
- Using references where possible
- Optimizing memory usage
However, there's a concerning lack of test coverage across all modified components. Consider adding:
- Unit tests for each modified method
- Integration tests for the complete request processing flow
- Performance benchmarks to validate the optimizations
Would you like me to help create a test plan or generate test cases for these changes?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 183-184: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L183-L184
Added lines #L183 - L184 were not covered by tests
[warning] 188-190: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L188-L190
Added lines #L188 - L190 were not covered by testsrocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (5)
511-511: Avoid unnecessary cloning ofCheetahStringIn line 511, cloning
cluster_nameandbroker_addrmay be unnecessary since they are already references. Consider passing them directly toquery_broker_topic_configto improve performance.Proposed change:
- let option = self.query_broker_topic_config(cluster_name.clone(), broker_addr.clone()); + let option = self.query_broker_topic_config(cluster_name, broker_addr);Ensure that
query_broker_topic_configaccepts references to&CheetahString.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 511-511: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L511
Added line #L511 was not covered by tests
522-525: Modifyquery_broker_topic_configto accept referencesCurrently,
query_broker_topic_configtakes ownership ofcluster_nameandbroker_addr, which can lead to unnecessary cloning. Change the parameters to accept&CheetahStringto prevent cloning and improve efficiency.Proposed change:
- pub(crate) fn query_broker_topic_config( - &self, - cluster_name: CheetahString, - broker_addr: CheetahString, - ) -> Option<&DataVersion> { + pub(crate) fn query_broker_topic_config( + &self, + cluster_name: &CheetahString, + broker_addr: &CheetahString, + ) -> Option<&DataVersion> {Update all call sites accordingly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 522-523: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L522-L523
Added lines #L522 - L523 were not covered by tests
[warning] 525-525: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L525
Added line #L525 was not covered by tests
641-642: Passcluster_nameandbroker_addrby referenceIn
update_broker_info_update_timestamp, consider acceptingcluster_nameandbroker_addras references to avoid unnecessary cloning ofCheetahStringinstances.Proposed change:
- pub(crate) fn update_broker_info_update_timestamp( - &mut self, - cluster_name: CheetahString, - broker_addr: CheetahString, + pub(crate) fn update_broker_info_update_timestamp( + &mut self, + cluster_name: &CheetahString, + broker_addr: &CheetahString, ) {Ensure the method implementation and callers are updated accordingly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 641-642: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L641-L642
Added lines #L641 - L642 were not covered by tests
737-737: Accepttopicby reference inregister_topicThe
register_topicmethod currently takes ownership oftopic, which might lead to unnecessary cloning if the caller doesn't have ownership. Accepting a reference can enhance performance.Proposed change:
- pub(crate) fn register_topic(&mut self, topic: CheetahString, queue_data_vec: Vec<QueueData>) { + pub(crate) fn register_topic(&mut self, topic: &CheetahString, queue_data_vec: Vec<QueueData>) {Update the method body to handle
topicas a reference and adjust any calling code.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 737-737: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L737
Added line #L737 was not covered by tests
762-764: Enhance log messages for clarityThe log messages can be improved for better readability and consistency.
Proposed changes:
- info!("Topic route already exist.{}, {:?}", topic, queue_data_map) + info!("Topic route already exists: {}, {:?}", topic, queue_data_map)- info!("Register topic route:{}, {:?}", topic, queue_data_map) + info!("Registered new topic route: {}, {:?}", topic, queue_data_map)🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 762-762: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L762
Added line #L762 was not covered by tests
[warning] 764-764: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L764
Added line #L764 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs(4 hunks)rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs(7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs
[warning] 183-184: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L183-L184
Added lines #L183 - L184 were not covered by tests
[warning] 188-190: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L188-L190
Added lines #L188 - L190 were not covered by tests
[warning] 313-314: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L313-L314
Added lines #L313 - L314 were not covered by tests
[warning] 324-327: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L324-L327
Added lines #L324 - L327 were not covered by tests
[warning] 399-399: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L399
Added line #L399 was not covered by tests
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs
[warning] 483-484: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L483-L484
Added lines #L483 - L484 were not covered by tests
[warning] 486-486: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L486
Added line #L486 was not covered by tests
[warning] 507-508: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L507-L508
Added lines #L507 - L508 were not covered by tests
[warning] 511-511: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L511
Added line #L511 was not covered by tests
[warning] 522-523: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L522-L523
Added lines #L522 - L523 were not covered by tests
[warning] 525-525: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L525
Added line #L525 was not covered by tests
[warning] 641-642: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L641-L642
Added lines #L641 - L642 were not covered by tests
[warning] 652-653: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L652-L653
Added lines #L652 - L653 were not covered by tests
[warning] 655-655: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L655
Added line #L655 was not covered by tests
[warning] 737-737: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L737
Added line #L737 was not covered by tests
[warning] 742-743: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L742-L743
Added lines #L742 - L743 were not covered by tests
[warning] 745-745: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L745
Added line #L745 was not covered by tests
[warning] 762-762: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L762
Added line #L762 was not covered by tests
[warning] 764-764: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L764
Added line #L764 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (5)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (2)
399-399:
Critical path optimization needs test coverage.
While the optimization is consistent with other changes, this is a critical path for topic registration and should be thoroughly tested.
Let's verify the topic registration functionality:
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 399-399: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L399
Added line #L399 was not covered by tests
183-184: String handling optimization looks good, but needs test coverage.
The change from as_str() to clone() aligns with the optimization goals. However, these changes are currently not covered by tests.
Let's verify the performance impact of these changes:
Also applies to: 188-190
✅ Verification successful
Let me check if there are any existing benchmarks specifically for the nameserver component and the string handling operations.
Let me verify the correct path for the route info manager and string handling patterns.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
String handling changes are appropriate and consistent with the codebase
The change from as_str() to clone() is correct as the codebase consistently uses CheetahString (a custom string type) for broker addresses and cluster names. The route info manager's data structures are designed to own these strings, making clone() the appropriate choice here.
- The codebase uses
CheetahStringthroughout the route info management system, particularly inroute/route_info_manager.rs - All broker and cluster related data structures store owned
CheetahStringvalues, not string references - No performance regression is expected as this aligns with the existing string handling patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing performance-related tests
rg -l "bench|perf|performance" --type rust
Length of output: 700
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for benchmark tests in namesrv
fd "bench" rocketmq-namesrv
# Check for any string handling patterns in the route info manager
rg "String|&str" rocketmq-namesrv/src/route_info_manager.rs -A 2
Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the correct path for route info manager
fd "route_info" --type f
# Look for string handling patterns in the entire namesrv directory
rg "String|&str" --type rust rocketmq-namesrv/
Length of output: 10790
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 183-184: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L183-L184
Added lines #L183 - L184 were not covered by tests
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (3)
483-486: Consistent use of CheetahString for improved type safety
The parameters cluster_name, broker_addr, and broker_name in is_topic_config_changed have been updated to &CheetahString, enhancing type safety and consistency across the codebase.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 483-484: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L483-L484
Added lines #L483 - L484 were not covered by tests
[warning] 486-486: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L486
Added line #L486 was not covered by tests
507-508: Consistent parameter types in is_broker_topic_config_changed
Parameters cluster_name and broker_addr in is_broker_topic_config_changed are now &CheetahString, aligning with the changes made in other methods for consistency.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 507-508: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L507-L508
Added lines #L507 - L508 were not covered by tests
742-745: Handle topic cloning appropriately
When inserting topic into topic_queue_table, ensure that cloning is necessary. If topic is changed to a reference, cloning during insertion is acceptable to maintain ownership within the table.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 742-743: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L742-L743
Added lines #L742 - L743 were not covered by tests
[warning] 745-745: rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs#L745
Added line #L745 was not covered by tests
| let broker_member_group = self | ||
| .route_info_manager | ||
| .write() | ||
| .get_broker_member_group(&request_header.cluster_name, &request_header.broker_name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add tests for broker member group functionality
The optimization to use references instead of cloned values in get_broker_member_group is good for performance, but there are no tests covering this functionality. Please add unit tests to verify:
- Retrieving broker member group with valid cluster and broker names
- Handling of non-existent cluster/broker combinations
- Proper behavior with concurrent read/write operations
🔗 Analysis chain
Good optimization using references, but needs test coverage.
Using references instead of cloned values is a good optimization that can improve performance by reducing unnecessary memory allocations.
Let's verify the broker member group functionality:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for broker member group tests
rg -A 5 "test.*broker.*member.*group" --type rust
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any tests related to the RouteInfoManager and broker functionality
rg -l "RouteInfoManager" --type rust
# Also search for any test modules in the namesrv directory
fd "test" -e rs --type f rocketmq-namesrv/
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the route_info_manager.rs file for existing tests
rg "mod test" -A 10 rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs
# Also check for any test functions related to broker operations
ast-grep --pattern 'fn test_$_broker$_() { $$$ }' rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs
Length of output: 171
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 324-327: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L324-L327
Added lines #L324 - L327 were not covered by tests
| request_header.cluster_name, | ||
| request_header.broker_addr, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing test coverage for broker heartbeat functionality
The verification reveals:
- No dedicated test files exist in the namesrv module
- The broker heartbeat functionality is critical for broker liveness detection (used in
scan_not_active_broker) - The string optimization changes in
process_broker_heartbeataffect core broker registration functionality
Action items:
- Add unit tests for
process_broker_heartbeatto verify the string handling changes - Include integration tests covering the broker heartbeat lifecycle with the route info manager
🔗 Analysis chain
Consistent string handling optimization, but needs test coverage.
The string handling changes are consistent with the optimization pattern seen elsewhere in the file. However, these changes are not covered by tests.
Let's verify the broker heartbeat functionality:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for broker heartbeat tests
rg -A 5 "test.*broker.*heartbeat" --type rust
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if there are any test files related to the default request processor
fd "test.*\.rs" rocketmq-namesrv/src
# Then let's look for any broker heartbeat related tests with a broader search
rg -l "broker.*heart|heart.*broker" --type rust
# Let's also check the implementation to understand the context better
ast-grep --pattern 'fn process_broker_heartbeat($$$)'
Length of output: 669
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test coverage in the namesrv module
fd "test" rocketmq-namesrv/src -t f -x cat {}
# Let's also check how broker heartbeat is used in the route info manager
rg -C 5 "broker.*heart|heart.*broker" rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs
# And check the actual implementation of process_broker_heartbeat
rg -C 10 "process_broker_heartbeat" rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs
Length of output: 2841
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 313-314: rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs#L313-L314
Added lines #L313 - L314 were not covered by tests
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1249
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation