-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
✨ Benchmark Registry #585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Benchmark Registry #585
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Signed-off-by: simon1hofmann <[email protected]>
41dced1
to
6b6e92f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really like this registry approach 👍🏻
Makes the library quite a bit cleaner and more extendable 😎
As always, the devil lies in the details. Hopefully the comments are fairly easy to address.
Signed-off-by: simon1hofmann <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking great and I believe is practically mergeable. I just have two more comments, which might not result in any code changes after all. I'll approve once the open conversations are resolved 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks really really good!
Feels like a very clean and consistent solution for the registries now across MQT Bench.
Let's get this in, while work on the arithmetic circuits is still ongoing.
Added a benchmark registry and added automatic imports to gatesets and devices.