Skip to content

3.4.9 breaks an execution order #3278

Closed
@kawanet

Description

@kawanet

msgpack-lite wip branch's test fails when minified with Uglify 3.4.9.
It also passes when minified with Uglify 3.4.8 however.
It looks 3.4.9 breaks something about the order to execute.

JavaScript input

The following function is found at https://github.com/kawanet/msgpack-lite/blob/master/lib/buffer-lite.js

function write(string, offset) {
  var buffer = this;
  var index = offset || (offset |= 0);
  var length = string.length;
  var chr = 0;
  var i = 0;
  while (i < length) {
    chr = string.charCodeAt(i++);

    if (chr < 128) {
      buffer[index++] = chr;
    } else if (chr < 0x800) {
      // 2 bytes
      buffer[index++] = 0xC0 | (chr >>> 6);
      buffer[index++] = 0x80 | (chr & 0x3F);
    } else if (chr < 0xD800 || chr > 0xDFFF) {
      // 3 bytes
      buffer[index++] = 0xE0 | (chr  >>> 12);
      buffer[index++] = 0x80 | ((chr >>> 6)  & 0x3F);
      buffer[index++] = 0x80 | (chr          & 0x3F);
    } else {
      // 4 bytes - surrogate pair
      chr = (((chr - 0xD800) << 10) | (string.charCodeAt(i++) - 0xDC00)) + 0x10000;
      buffer[index++] = 0xF0 | (chr >>> 18);
      buffer[index++] = 0x80 | ((chr >>> 12) & 0x3F);
      buffer[index++] = 0x80 | ((chr >>> 6)  & 0x3F);
      buffer[index++] = 0x80 | (chr          & 0x3F);
    }
  }
  return index - offset;
}

The uglifyjs CLI command

uglifyjs -c -m -o min.js buffer-lite.js

Uglify 3.4.8 🆗

function write(r, t) {
  for (var e = this, h = t || (t |= 0), n = r.length, o = 0, a = 0; a < n;)
    (o = r.charCodeAt(a++)) < 128 ? e[h++] = o
      : (o < 2048 ? e[h++] = 192 | o >>> 6
      : (o < 55296 || 57343 < o ? e[h++] = 224 | o >>> 12
        : (o = 65536 + (o - 55296 << 10 | r.charCodeAt(a++) - 56320), e[h++] = 240 | o >>> 18, e[h++] = 128 | o >>> 12 & 63), e[h++] = 128 | o >>> 6 & 63), e[h++] = 128 | 63 & o);
  return h - t
}

Uglify 3.4.9 🆖

function write(r, t) {
  for (var e = this, h = t || (t |= 0), n = r.length, o = 0, a = 0; a < n;)
    o = r.charCodeAt(a++), e[h++] = o < 128 ? o
      : (e[h++] = o < 2048 ? 192 | o >>> 6
        : (e[h++] = o < 55296 || 57343 < o ? 224 | o >>> 12
          : (o = 65536 + (o - 55296 << 10 | r.charCodeAt(a++) - 56320), e[h++] = 240 | o >>> 18, 128 | o >>> 12 & 63), 128 | o >>> 6 & 63), 128 | 63 & o);
  return h - t
}

It looks e[h++] = o is moved to wrong positions.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions