-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
User/aamaini/2281511 #1409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User/aamaini/2281511 #1409
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1409 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 89.7% 89.7%
=====================================
Files 407 407
Lines 32269 32294 +25
Branches 1986 1990 +4
=====================================
+ Hits 28966 28990 +24
Misses 2879 2879
- Partials 424 425 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft" |
👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the
If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂 |
Bumped to 2. |
Existing implementation of Go117 detector parses go.sum when go version in go.mod < 1.17. This leads to overreporting.
go list
command if available/enabledgo list
fails, detector falls back to parsinggo.sum
file.go.sum
if cli scan succeeded.This will reduce the divergence between reports from Go117 and Go detector since Go detector used Go CLI if available.
Tests:
So, Go, Go117 (in feature) branch are in parity w.r.t
#components
reported.