feat: upgrade script from 0.4.10 to 0.5.0 #941
Conversation
Natoandro
force-pushed
the
met-774-typegraph-upgrade
branch
from
e0626e6 to
1ac6397
Compare
Add python code validation on deploy --- - [x] The change comes with new or modified tests - [ ] Hard-to-understand functions have explanatory comments - [ ] End-user documentation is updated to reflect the change
# Conflicts: # deno.lock # tests/e2e/published/published_test.ts
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request represents a comprehensive version update from Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Repo as Repository
participant Build as Build System
participant Version as Version Management
Dev->>Repo: Prepare release
Repo->>Version: Update version constants
Version-->>Repo: Confirm version updates
Repo->>Build: Trigger build with new version
Build->>Build: Update version in multiple files
Build->>Repo: Commit version changes
Dev->>Repo: Review and merge changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
tests/e2e/published/sdk_test.ts (2)
100-175: Refactor to reduce code duplication in test casesThe test cases for
npm_jsr,deno_jsr, andpypa(lines 100-175) contain similar setup and deployment logic. Consider refactoring these sections to use shared functions or loops to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
177-177: Consider graceful termination of the spawned processUsing
proc.kill("SIGKILL")forcefully terminates the process, which might prevent proper cleanup or release of resources. Consider terminating the process gracefully usingSIGTERMor implementing a shutdown mechanism within the process to handle termination signals.tests/e2e/published/common.ts (1)
34-34: Address the FIXME: Implement caching across test runsThere's a
FIXMEcomment indicating the need to cache the cloned repository across test runs. Implementing caching can significantly reduce test execution time by avoiding redundant downloads.Do you want me to help implement a caching mechanism to improve test performance?
tests/e2e/published/config.ts (1)
18-36: Reduce code duplication betweenconfigfunction andConfigclass.The configuration logic is duplicated between the
configfunction andConfigclass constructor.Consider refactoring to share the common logic:
+ function createSyncConfig(redisDb: number, s3Bucket: string) { + const syncEnvs = { + SYNC_REDIS_URL: `redis://:password@localhost:6379/${redisDb}`, + SYNC_S3_BUCKET: s3Bucket, + ...defaultSyncEnvs, + }; + const syncConfig = transformSyncConfig({ + redis_url: new URL(syncEnvs.SYNC_REDIS_URL), + s3_host: new URL(syncEnvs.SYNC_S3_HOST), + s3_region: syncEnvs.SYNC_S3_REGION, + s3_access_key: syncEnvs.SYNC_S3_ACCESS_KEY, + s3_secret_key: syncEnvs.SYNC_S3_SECRET_KEY, + s3_bucket: syncEnvs.SYNC_S3_BUCKET, + s3_path_style: true, + force_remove: false, + }); + return { syncConfig, syncEnvs }; + } export function config(p: { redisDb: number; s3Bucket: string }) { - const syncEnvs = { - SYNC_REDIS_URL: `redis://:password@localhost:6379/${p.redisDb}`, - SYNC_S3_BUCKET: p.s3Bucket, - ...defaultSyncEnvs, - }; - const syncConfig = transformSyncConfig({...}); - return { syncConfig, syncEnvs }; + return createSyncConfig(p.redisDb, p.s3Bucket); } export class Config { syncEnvs: Record<string, string>; syncConfig: ReturnType<typeof transformSyncConfig>; constructor(redisDb: number, s3Bucket: string) { - this.syncEnvs = {...}; - this.syncConfig = transformSyncConfig({...}); + const config = createSyncConfig(redisDb, s3Bucket); + this.syncEnvs = config.syncEnvs; + this.syncConfig = config.syncConfig; } // ... }Also applies to: 38-67
tools/tasks/lock.ts (1)
63-87: Enhance error messages in version validation.The version validation logic is solid, but the error messages could be more descriptive to help users understand and fix version-related issues.
Consider enhancing the error messages with more context:
assert( semver.greaterThan(currentVersion, latestRelease), - "expected current version to be greater than latest release version", + `Current version ${currentVersion} must be greater than latest release ${latestRelease}`, ); if (isPreRelease) { assert( semver.greaterThan(currentVersion, latestPreRelease!), - "expected current version to be greater than latest pre-release version", + `Current pre-release ${currentVersion} must be greater than latest pre-release ${latestPreRelease}`, ); }tests/e2e/published/utils.ts (1)
16-32: Enhance error handling in checkMetaBin.The function catches all errors and only logs them. Consider:
- Differentiating between expected errors (version mismatch) and unexpected ones
- Adding more context to the error message
async function checkMetaBin(path: typeof tempDir, version: string) { try { if (!(await path.exists())) { return false; } const res = await $`bash -c 'meta-old --version'` .env("PATH", `${path.parent()!.toString()}:${Deno.env.get("PATH")}`) .stdout("piped"); if (res.stdout.includes(version)) { return true; } - throw new Error(`version mismatch: ${res.stdout}`); + throw new Error(`CLI version mismatch: expected ${version}, got ${res.stdout.trim()}`); } catch (e) { - console.error(e); + if (e instanceof Error && e.message.startsWith('CLI version mismatch')) { + console.warn(e.message); + } else { + console.error('Unexpected error checking meta binary:', e); + } return false; } }src/typegate/src/typegate/register.ts (1)
107-107: Consider log level for meta information.Debug logging of meta information might be too verbose for production.
Consider adding a condition or using a more specific log level:
- console.debug("meta", engine.tg.tg.meta); + if (process.env.DEBUG_TYPEGRAPH) { + console.debug("typegraph meta:", engine.tg.tg.meta); + }src/typegate/src/transports/graphql/typegraph.ts (1)
150-170: Consider optimizing the namespace initialization.The recursive traversal of object nodes could be optimized:
- Consider using a Set to avoid duplicate indices
- Consider using a non-recursive implementation for large type graphs
Here's an optimized version using a Set:
-export function setNamespaces(tg: TypeGraphDS) { - if (tg.meta.namespaces != null) { - return; - } - const namespaces: number[] = []; - - const rootNode = tg.types[0] as ObjectNode; - - const addNamespacesFrom = (node: ObjectNode, nodeIdx: number) => { - namespaces.push(nodeIdx); - for (const [, typeIdx] of Object.entries(node.properties)) { - const childNode = tg.types[typeIdx]; - if (childNode.type === Type.OBJECT) { - addNamespacesFrom(childNode, typeIdx); - } - } - }; - - addNamespacesFrom(rootNode, 0); - tg.meta.namespaces = namespaces; +export function setNamespaces(tg: TypeGraphDS) { + if (tg.meta.namespaces != null) { + return; + } + const namespaces = new Set<number>(); + const stack = [{node: tg.types[0] as ObjectNode, idx: 0}]; + + while (stack.length > 0) { + const {node, idx} = stack.pop()!; + namespaces.add(idx); + + for (const [, typeIdx] of Object.entries(node.properties)) { + const childNode = tg.types[typeIdx]; + if (childNode.type === Type.OBJECT) { + stack.push({node: childNode, idx: typeIdx}); + } + } + } + + tg.meta.namespaces = Array.from(namespaces); +}ghjk.ts (1)
157-167: Improve version bump error handling.The version bump logic should validate the version format and handle edge cases for pre-release versions.
Consider adding version format validation:
if (bump === "prerelease") { + if (!semver.valid(CURRENT_VERSION) || !semver.valid(LATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSION || LATEST_RELEASE_VERSION)) { + throw new Error('Invalid version format'); + } $.logStep( `Bumping published version ${ LATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSION || LATEST_RELEASE_VERSION } → ${CURRENT_VERSION}`, );tests/e2e/published/typegate_upgrade_test.ts (3)
17-19: Document the disabled tests rationale.The comment about build.rs and meta-old is unclear. Please provide more detailed documentation about why these tests are disabled and when they can be re-enabled.
66-82: Enhance process management robustness.The process spawning could be more robust with timeout handling and proper error management.
Consider adding timeout and error handling:
- const proc = new Deno.Command("meta-old", { + const TIMEOUT_MS = 30000; + const proc = await Promise.race([ + new Deno.Command("meta-old", { args: ["typegate"], env: { ...Deno.env.toObject(), LOG_LEVEL: "DEBUG", PATH: `${metaBinDir}:${Deno.env.get("PATH")}`, TG_SECRET: tgSecret, TG_ADMIN_PASSWORD: "password", TMP_DIR: typegateTempDir, TG_PORT: port, VERSION: previousVersion, ...testConfig.syncEnvs, }, stdout: "piped", - }).spawn(); + }).spawn(), + new Promise((_, reject) => + setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Process spawn timeout')), TIMEOUT_MS) + ) + ]).catch(error => { + throw new Error(`Failed to spawn process: ${error.message}`); + });
192-194: Enhance test assertions.The test only verifies array equality. Consider adding more specific assertions about the typegraph content and structure.
Consider adding more detailed assertions:
- await t.should("have the same typegraphs", () => { - assertEquals(typegraphs.sort(), typegraphs2.sort()); + await t.should("verify typegraph compatibility", () => { + // Verify array equality + assertEquals(typegraphs.sort(), typegraphs2.sort()); + + // Verify each typegraph exists and has expected structure + for (const tg of typegraphs) { + t.assert(tg.includes('/'), `Invalid typegraph path: ${tg}`); + // Add more specific assertions about typegraph structure + } });src/typegate/src/runtimes/deno/deno.ts (1)
233-233: Consider making the debug log conditional.The unconditional log statement could clutter logs in production. Consider wrapping it with a debug flag check:
- console.log("root type", this.tg.types[0]); + if (this.verbose) { + logger.debug("root type", this.tg.types[0]); + }src/typegate/src/engine/planner/mod.ts (1)
548-554: LGTM! Clean and safe implementation.The changes improve code clarity and null safety. The explicit block structure and nullish coalescing operator make the code more robust.
Consider extracting the type check into a descriptive variable for even better readability:
- inputType.id?.includes(key) ?? false, + const isRequiredField = inputType.id?.includes(key) ?? false; + isRequiredField,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
.ghjk/deno.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockCargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockdeno.lockis excluded by!**/*.locktests/metagen/__snapshots__/metagen_test.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
.ghjk/lock.json(43 hunks)Cargo.toml(1 hunks)examples/templates/deno/api/example.ts(1 hunks)examples/templates/deno/compose.yml(1 hunks)examples/templates/node/compose.yml(1 hunks)examples/templates/node/package.json(1 hunks)examples/templates/python/compose.yml(1 hunks)examples/templates/python/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)ghjk.ts(4 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)src/common/src/typegraph/mod.rs(1 hunks)src/pyrt_wit_wire/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/engine/planner/mod.ts(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/runtimes/deno/deno.ts(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/runtimes/wit_wire/mod.ts(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/transports/graphql/typegraph.ts(2 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegate/mod.ts(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegate/register.ts(3 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegraph/types.ts(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegraph/versions.ts(2 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegraphs/introspection.json(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegraphs/prisma_migration.json(1 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegraphs/typegate.json(1 hunks)src/typegraph/core/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)src/typegraph/core/src/global_store.rs(1 hunks)src/typegraph/core/src/typegraph.rs(2 hunks)src/typegraph/deno/deno.json(1 hunks)src/typegraph/python/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)src/typegraph/python/typegraph/__init__.py(1 hunks)src/xtask/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/common.ts(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/config.ts(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/published_test.ts(0 hunks)tests/e2e/published/sdk_test.ts(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/typegate_upgrade_test.ts(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/utils.ts(1 hunks)tests/metagen/typegraphs/sample/rs/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)tests/metagen/typegraphs/sample/rs_upload/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)tests/runtimes/wasm_reflected/rust/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)tools/consts.ts(5 hunks)tools/deps.ts(1 hunks)tools/jsr/deno2node.ts(2 hunks)tools/jsr/jsr-gen.ts(2 hunks)tools/tasks/lock.ts(2 hunks)whiz.yaml(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/e2e/published/published_test.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (20)
- src/typegate/src/typegate/mod.ts
- src/xtask/Cargo.toml
- whiz.yaml
- src/typegate/src/runtimes/wit_wire/mod.ts
- tests/metagen/typegraphs/sample/rs_upload/Cargo.toml
- src/typegate/src/typegraphs/typegate.json
- src/typegraph/deno/deno.json
- src/pyrt_wit_wire/pyproject.toml
- src/typegate/src/typegraphs/introspection.json
- examples/templates/deno/compose.yml
- tests/runtimes/wasm_reflected/rust/Cargo.toml
- src/typegraph/python/pyproject.toml
- src/typegraph/python/typegraph/init.py
- src/typegraph/core/src/global_store.rs
- tests/metagen/typegraphs/sample/rs/Cargo.toml
- src/typegate/src/typegraphs/prisma_migration.json
- examples/templates/python/compose.yml
- examples/templates/deno/api/example.ts
- examples/templates/node/compose.yml
- src/typegraph/core/Cargo.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
.ghjk/lock.json
1010-1010: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1016-1016: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1021-1021: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1027-1027: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1032-1032: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1038-1038: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1044-1044: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1050-1050: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1055-1055: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1061-1061: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1066-1066: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1071-1071: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1076-1076: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1081-1081: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1087-1087: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1094-1094: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1099-1099: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1107-1107: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1113-1113: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1120-1120: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1126-1126: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1132-1132: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1138-1138: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1144-1144: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1150-1150: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1156-1156: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1162-1162: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1168-1168: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1174-1174: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1179-1179: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1184-1184: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1192-1192: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1200-1200: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1208-1208: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1217-1217: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1222-1222: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: lint-compat (macos-14, aarch64-apple-darwin, false)
- GitHub Check: lint-compat (macos-13, x86_64-apple-darwin, false)
- GitHub Check: test-full
- GitHub Check: pre-commit
🔇 Additional comments (23)
tests/e2e/published/sdk_test.ts (2)
34-34: Caution: Use of 'only' may skip other testsThe use of
only: version === LATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSIONin the test configuration will cause the test framework to run only this test whenversionequalsLATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSION. This may unintentionally skip other versions inpreviousVersions. Please verify if this behavior is intended.
74-74: Confirm logging with 'console.error'In line 74,
console.error("typegate>", line);is used to log standard output. If the intention is to log regular information, consider usingconsole.loginstead ofconsole.errorto differentiate between standard output and error messages.tools/jsr/jsr-gen.ts (1)
60-60: Version update aligns with current versionChanging the version from
METATYPE_VERSIONtoCURRENT_VERSIONensures that thedeno.jsonfile reflects the accurate current version of the package. This update is appropriate and maintains consistency across the codebase.tools/jsr/deno2node.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Version reference updates are consistent.The changes correctly update the version references to use
CURRENT_VERSION, maintaining consistency with the version upgrade across the codebase.Also applies to: 59-59
src/typegate/src/typegraph/versions.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM! Version update is consistent.The typegraph version has been correctly updated to "0.0.4".
42-49: Verify the migration strategy for version 0.0.4.The migration enforces a manual upgrade process by requiring the
SYNC_FORCE_REMOVE=trueenvironment variable. This is a breaking change that requires user intervention.Please ensure that:
- This requirement is documented in the migration guide
- Users are informed about potential data loss when using
SYNC_FORCE_REMOVE=truetools/tasks/lock.ts (1)
18-18: LGTM! Version validation is called at the right place.The
validateVersions()function is correctly called at the beginning of the task to ensure version consistency.tests/e2e/published/utils.ts (1)
1-10: LGTM! Clean import organization.The imports are well-organized, grouped by functionality (local tools, download utilities, and encoding/IO operations).
tools/deps.ts (1)
49-49: LGTM! Clean addition of assert export.The addition of the assert export from the standard library is well-placed with other std exports.
tools/consts.ts (2)
4-6: Verify version sequence logic.The version constants follow this sequence:
- CURRENT_VERSION: "0.5.0"
- LATEST_RELEASE_VERSION: "0.4.10"
- LATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSION: "0.5.0-rc.9"
This looks correct for upgrading from RC to stable.
✅ Verification successful
Version constants are correctly sequenced ✅
The version constants accurately reflect the repository's version history:
- LATEST_RELEASE_VERSION "0.4.10" matches the latest stable release tag
- LATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSION "0.5.0-rc.9" matches the latest pre-release tag
- CURRENT_VERSION "0.5.0" is correctly prepared for the upcoming stable release
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify version tags in the repository gh api repos/metatypedev/metatype/tags | jq -r '.[].name' | head -n 5Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get all tags and filter for relevant versions gh api repos/metatypedev/metatype/tags | jq -r '.[].name' | grep -E "v0\.4\.10|v0\.5\.0"Length of output: 218
Line range hint
27-88: Verify all version pattern replacements.The sedLockLines patterns have been updated to use CURRENT_VERSION. Let's verify the changes are complete.
✅ Verification successful
Version pattern replacements are correctly implemented
The version patterns in sedLockLines are being properly replaced with CURRENT_VERSION. The existing version constants (METATYPE_VERSION, SDK_VERSION, TYPEGRAPH_VERSION) serve different purposes in the codebase and should not be replaced.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to old version constants rg "METATYPE_VERSION" --type-not snapLength of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining version-related constants rg -i "version" --type ts --type rust --type python --type toml -g '!**/node_modules/**' -g '!**/target/**' # Also check for specific version patterns that might have been missed rg -i '(version|tag)\s*[=:]\s*["'\''][0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' --type ts --type rust --type python --type toml -g '!**/node_modules/**' -g '!**/target/**'Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for version-related constants in specific file types rg -i "version" -g '*.{ts,rs,py,toml}' -g '!**/node_modules/**' -g '!**/target/**' -g '!**/dist/**' # Search for hardcoded version numbers rg -i '(version|tag)\s*[=:]\s*["'\''][0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' -g '*.{ts,rs,py,toml}' -g '!**/node_modules/**' -g '!**/target/**' -g '!**/dist/**' # Search for any remaining old version constants rg "(METATYPE_VERSION|SDK_VERSION|TYPEGRAPH_VERSION)" -g '*.{ts,rs,py,toml}' -g '!**/node_modules/**' -g '!**/target/**' -g '!**/dist/**'Length of output: 69014
src/typegate/src/typegate/register.ts (1)
64-69: Review temporary namespace initialization hack.The comment indicates this is a temporary fix. We should:
- Understand why namespaces aren't set
- Create a tracking issue for proper fix
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the proper fix for namespace initialization?
✅ Verification successful
Namespace initialization safety check is warranted
The "temporary hack" serves as a necessary fallback mechanism. Namespaces are critical for GraphQL query/mutation organization and are checked by multiple runtimes. While they should be initialized during typegraph processing, this safety check ensures system stability.
- The proper initialization happens in
src/transports/graphql/typegraph.ts- Multiple runtimes depend on namespaces being set correctly
- Consider documenting this dependency in the typegraph initialization flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for namespace initialization patterns ast-grep --pattern 'meta.namespaces = $_'Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for namespace-related code and setNamespaces function rg -t ts "namespaces|setNamespaces" -A 3 # Find files containing setNamespaces function ast-grep --pattern 'function setNamespaces($_) { $$$ }' # Look for property assignments with namespaces ast-grep --pattern '$_.namespaces = $$$'Length of output: 9677
src/typegate/src/transports/graphql/typegraph.ts (1)
149-150: Remove or document the TEMPORARY comment.The comment indicates this is a temporary solution. Please either remove the TEMPORARY marker if this is now a permanent solution or document when and why this temporary solution will be replaced.
src/common/src/typegraph/mod.rs (1)
100-102: LGTM! Well-structured field addition.The namespaces field is well-defined with appropriate serde attributes for serialization optimization.
src/typegate/src/typegraph/types.ts (1)
71-71: Verify the implications of makingidoptional inObjectNode.Making the
idproperty optional could affect type checking and validation throughout the codebase. Please ensure that:
- All code paths handle the case where
idis undefined- This change doesn't break any existing functionality that relies on the presence of
id✅ Verification successful
Making
idoptional inObjectNodeappears safeThe codebase already handles the optional nature of the
idproperty safely through:
- Optional chaining when accessing the property (e.g.,
inputType.id?.includes())- Proper type guards and validation
- No direct property access that assumes
idis required🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of ObjectNode.id to ensure they handle undefined case rg -A 3 'ObjectNode.*id'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find ObjectNode definition and usage ast-grep --pattern 'interface ObjectNode' ast-grep --pattern 'class ObjectNode' # Search for ObjectNode usage with broader context rg -A 5 'ObjectNode' # Look for id property access patterns rg -A 3 '\.id\s*[=?:]' rg -A 3 '\bid:' # Search specifically in types.ts cat src/typegate/src/typegraph/types.tsLength of output: 72002
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ObjectNode type definition and direct id access ast-grep --pattern 'type ObjectNode = { $$$id$$$}' ast-grep --pattern 'ObjectNode.id' ast-grep --pattern '$_.id?.includes' ast-grep --pattern '$_.id?.' # Look for validation and type checking code rg -A 5 'ObjectNode.*type.*=.*"object"' rg -A 5 'isObject.*\{'Length of output: 2180
src/typegraph/core/src/typegraph.rs (1)
119-119: Verify namespace initialization.The new
namespacesfield is initialized with a default value. Please ensure:
- The default value is appropriate for all use cases
- Existing code that might interact with namespaces is updated
✅ Verification successful
The namespace initialization is appropriate and safe.
The
namespacesfield is correctly initialized usingDefault::default(), which creates an emptyVec<u32>. This is consistent with:
- The type definition in common/typegraph/mod.rs
- The initialization pattern used for other collection fields in the same struct
- Rust's idiomatic practices for safe default values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for namespace-related code that might need updates rg "namespaces" --type rustLength of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get struct definition containing namespaces in typegraph.rs echo "=== Struct Definition ===" ast-grep --pattern 'struct $_ { $$$ namespaces: $_ $$$ }' # Find methods accessing namespaces echo -e "\n=== Methods Accessing Namespaces ===" ast-grep --pattern ' fn $name($_) { $$$ namespaces $$$ }' # Check imports echo -e "\n=== Imports ===" rg "use.*typegraph" --type rustLength of output: 12733
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get more context around the namespaces field in typegraph.rs echo "=== Typegraph.rs Context ===" rg -B 5 -A 5 "namespaces: Default::default" src/typegraph/core/src/typegraph.rs # Get struct and impl blocks echo -e "\n=== Struct Definition and Implementations ===" ast-grep --pattern 'struct TypegraphContext { $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Implementations ===" ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for TypegraphContext { $$$ }'Length of output: 805
examples/templates/python/pyproject.toml (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version updates are consistent.The version updates from
0.5.0-rc.9to0.5.0align with the project-wide transition from release candidate to stable version.Also applies to: 9-9
examples/templates/node/package.json (1)
9-9: LGTM! Version update is consistent.The dependency version update from
^0.5.0-rc.9to^0.5.0aligns with the project-wide transition to stable version.pyproject.toml (1)
9-9: LGTM! Version update is consistent.The version update from
0.5.0-rc.9to0.5.0aligns with the project-wide transition to stable version.Cargo.toml (1)
27-27: LGTM! Version update is consistent.The workspace package version update from
0.5.0-rc.9to0.5.0aligns with the project-wide transition to stable version..ghjk/lock.json (3)
1010-1010: LGTM! Environment key updates look consistent.The environment keys have been systematically updated across all tasks, maintaining the expected format and uniqueness.
Also applies to: 1016-1016, 1021-1021, 1027-1027, 1032-1032, 1038-1038, 1044-1044, 1050-1050, 1055-1055, 1061-1061, 1066-1066, 1071-1071, 1076-1076, 1081-1081, 1087-1087, 1094-1094, 1099-1099, 1107-1107, 1113-1113, 1120-1120, 1126-1126, 1132-1132, 1138-1138, 1144-1144, 1150-1150, 1156-1156, 1162-1162, 1168-1168, 1174-1174, 1179-1179, 1184-1184, 1192-1192, 1200-1200, 1208-1208, 1217-1217, 1222-1222
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
1010-1010: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1280-1280: LGTM! TYPEGRAPH_VERSION update is consistent.The
TYPEGRAPH_VERSIONenvironment variable has been updated from0.0.3to0.0.4consistently across all environments.Also applies to: 1313-1313, 1346-1346, 1379-1379, 1412-1412, 1445-1445, 1478-1478, 1516-1516, 1549-1549, 1582-1582, 1615-1615, 1683-1683, 1786-1786, 1819-1819, 1857-1857, 1895-1895, 1933-1933, 1966-1966, 1999-1999, 2037-2037
2063-2070: LGTM! Environment mappings are consistent.The environment name to key mappings have been updated correctly to match the new environment keys.
# Conflicts: # .ghjk/lock.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
ghjk.ts (1)
Line range hint
1615-1615: Security: Hardcoded credentials in environment configurationThe configuration contains hardcoded credentials in environment variables:
- Redis password
- TG_SECRET
- TG_ADMIN_PASSWORD
These should be moved to a secure secrets management system.
Consider using environment-specific secret management:
- Development: Use
.envfiles (added to .gitignore)- Production: Use a secrets manager or environment variables
- CI/CD: Use repository secrets
Also applies to: 1645-1647
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.ghjk/lock.json (1)
Line range hint
1635-1655: Review Redis configuration securityThe Redis configuration uses default ports and basic authentication. Consider:
- Using non-default ports
- Enabling SSL/TLS
- Implementing connection pooling
- Setting up proper ACLs
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
1010-1010: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1016-1016: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1021-1021: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1027-1027: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1032-1032: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1038-1038: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1044-1044: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1050-1050: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1055-1055: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1061-1061: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1066-1066: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1071-1071: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1076-1076: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1081-1081: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1087-1087: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1094-1094: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1099-1099: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1107-1107: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1113-1113: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1120-1120: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1126-1126: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1132-1132: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1138-1138: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1144-1144: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1150-1150: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1156-1156: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1162-1162: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1168-1168: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1174-1174: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1179-1179: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1184-1184: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1192-1192: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1200-1200: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1208-1208: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.ghjk/lock.json(43 hunks)ghjk.ts(4 hunks)src/typegate/src/typegraphs/typegate.json(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/common.ts(1 hunks)tests/e2e/published/utils.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/typegate/src/typegraphs/typegate.json
- tests/e2e/published/utils.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
.ghjk/lock.json
1010-1010: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1016-1016: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1021-1021: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1027-1027: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1032-1032: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1038-1038: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1044-1044: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1050-1050: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1055-1055: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1061-1061: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1066-1066: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1071-1071: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1076-1076: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1081-1081: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1087-1087: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1094-1094: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1099-1099: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1107-1107: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1113-1113: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1120-1120: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1126-1126: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1132-1132: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1138-1138: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1144-1144: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1150-1150: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1156-1156: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1162-1162: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1168-1168: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1174-1174: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1179-1179: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1184-1184: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1192-1192: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1200-1200: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1208-1208: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1217-1217: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1222-1222: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
tests/e2e/published/common.ts (6)
1-8: LGTM! Well-structured imports and proper licensing.The file starts with appropriate copyright and license headers, and the imports are well-organized and properly scoped.
9-13: LGTM! Clear and purposeful type definition.The
PreludeStepsOutputtype clearly defines the structure of the function's return value with descriptive field names.
14-17: LGTM! Well-designed function signature.The function signature is clear, properly typed, and follows TypeScript best practices.
18-24: LGTM! Clear and well-documented test step.The CLI download step is well-implemented with clear progress reporting through the test framework.
50-54: LGTM! Clean and type-safe return statement.The return statement properly matches the
PreludeStepsOutputtype and handles path conversion correctly.
26-48: Optimize git operations and clean up configuration.Several improvements could be made to this section:
- The git clone operation could be optimized and made more resilient
- The
undefineddir parameter seems unnecessary- The FIXME comment about caching should be addressed
Consider applying these improvements:
- const examplesDir = $.path( - await newTempDir({ - dir: undefined, - }), - ); + const examplesDir = $.path(await newTempDir()); await t.should( "download example typegraphs for the published version", async () => { const tag = `v${version}`; - // FIXME: cache across test runs - await $`git clone https://github.com/metatypedev/metatype.git --depth 1 --branch ${tag}` + try { + await $`git clone https://github.com/metatypedev/metatype.git --depth 1 --single-branch --branch ${tag}` + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to clone repository: ${error.message}`); + }Regarding the FIXME comment about caching, let's verify if there's an existing caching mechanism we could leverage:
✅ Verification successful
Optimize git clone operation and remove caching FIXME
The FIXME comment about caching can be removed as implementing cross-run caching would add unnecessary complexity for e2e tests that require version-specific fresh clones. The git clone operation can still be optimized as suggested in the original review:
- // FIXME: cache across test runs - await $`git clone https://github.com/metatypedev/metatype.git --depth 1 --branch ${tag}` + try { + await $`git clone https://github.com/metatypedev/metatype.git --depth 1 --single-branch --branch ${tag}` + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to clone repository: ${error.message}`); + }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing caching implementations in test files rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' 'cache.*test' ./testsLength of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the related test file and look for test utilities echo "=== Related test file ===" cat ./tests/e2e/published/typegate_upgrade_test.ts echo -e "\n=== Test utilities and configuration ===" fd -e ts -e js "test.*config|test.*utils|test.*helper" ./testsLength of output: 6518
ghjk.ts (2)
126-127: Verify version bump implementationThe version bump logic looks correct but should be tested with different version patterns to ensure it handles all cases correctly.
Run this script to verify version bump behavior:
Also applies to: 131-169
✅ Verification successful
Version bump implementation verified successfully
The implementation correctly handles both regular releases (x.y.z) and pre-releases (x.y.z-rc.n) while maintaining version history and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Test version bump logic with different patterns # Check for version references echo "Checking version references..." rg -A 2 'CURRENT_VERSION|LATEST_PRE_RELEASE_VERSION|LATEST_RELEASE_VERSION' # Check version format consistency echo "Checking version format consistency..." rg -o 'version["\s]+:\s+"[^"]+"' | sort | uniqLength of output: 6980
28-28:⚠️ Potential issueBreaking changes in version 0.0.4 require documentation
The update to TYPEGRAPH_VERSION "0.0.4" introduces breaking changes (as evidenced by the migration logic throwing an error), but no migration guide or documentation was found. This could impact dependent systems.
Run this script to check for migration guides and breaking changes:
.ghjk/lock.json (1)
Line range hint
1269-1313: Version consistency check required across environmentsThe TYPEGRAPH_VERSION is set to "0.0.4" across multiple environments. Ensure this is intentionally synchronized and verify compatibility with all dependent services.
Run this script to verify version consistency:
Also applies to: 1336-1346, 1369-1379, 1402-1412, 1435-1445, 1468-1478, 1506-1516, 1539-1549, 1572-1582, 1605-1615, 1673-1683, 1776-1786, 1809-1819, 1847-1857, 1885-1895, 1923-1933, 1956-1966, 1989-1999, 2032-2042
✅ Verification successful
Version consistency verified across environments
The TYPEGRAPH_VERSION is consistently set to "0.0.4" across all 20 environments in lock.json. The old version "0.0.3" appears only in test snapshots and test files, which likely need updating but don't affect the runtime environments.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check version consistency across environments # Extract and compare versions echo "Checking version consistency..." rg -o '"TYPEGRAPH_VERSION".*"([^"]+)"' | sort | uniq -c # Check for any remaining old versions echo "Checking for old versions..." rg "0.0.3"Length of output: 75309
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search specifically for TYPEGRAPH_VERSION in lock.json echo "Checking TYPEGRAPH_VERSION in lock.json..." rg -A 1 '"TYPEGRAPH_VERSION"' .ghjk/lock.json # Count occurrences echo -e "\nCounting occurrences..." rg -c '"TYPEGRAPH_VERSION"' .ghjk/lock.jsonLength of output: 1891
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.ghjk/lock.json (1)
Line range hint
1590-1620: Security: Hardcoded credentials in environment variables.Several environment variables contain hardcoded sensitive information:
- Redis passwords
- Admin passwords
- Secret keys
- S3 credentials
Consider:
- Using environment-specific configuration files
- Implementing a secrets management solution
- Using placeholder values in the lock file
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.ghjk/lock.json(83 hunks)examples/typegraphs/metagen/rs/fdk.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
.ghjk/lock.json
969-969: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
975-975: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
980-980: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
986-986: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
991-991: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
997-997: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1003-1003: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1009-1009: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1014-1014: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1020-1020: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1025-1025: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1030-1030: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1035-1035: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1040-1040: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1046-1046: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1053-1053: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1058-1058: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1066-1066: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1072-1072: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1079-1079: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1085-1085: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1091-1091: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1097-1097: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1103-1103: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1109-1109: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1115-1115: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1121-1121: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1127-1127: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1133-1133: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1138-1138: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1143-1143: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1151-1151: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1159-1159: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1167-1167: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1176-1176: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1181-1181: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: bulid-docker (linux/arm64, custom-arm)
- GitHub Check: bulid-docker (linux/amd64, custom-ubuntu-large)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.ghjk/lock.json (4)
1239-1239: Consistent version update across environments.The TYPEGRAPH_VERSION has been updated from 0.0.3 to 0.0.4 consistently across all environment configurations.
Also applies to: 1272-1272, 1305-1305, 1338-1338, 1371-1371, 1404-1404, 1437-1437, 1475-1475, 1508-1508, 1541-1541, 1574-1574, 1642-1642, 1745-1745, 1778-1778, 1816-1816, 1854-1854, 1892-1892, 1925-1925, 1958-1958, 2001-2001
Line range hint
969-1181: Task configurations are well-structured and properly updated.The task configurations have been updated with:
- Clear descriptions for each task
- Proper dependency chains
- Updated environment keys
- Consistent naming conventions
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
969-969: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
975-975: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
980-980: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
986-986: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
991-991: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
997-997: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1003-1003: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1009-1009: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1014-1014: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1020-1020: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1025-1025: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1030-1030: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1035-1035: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1040-1040: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1046-1046: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1053-1053: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1058-1058: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1066-1066: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1072-1072: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1079-1079: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1085-1085: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1091-1091: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1097-1097: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1103-1103: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1109-1109: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1115-1115: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1121-1121: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1127-1127: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1133-1133: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1138-1138: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1143-1143: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1151-1151: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1159-1159: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1167-1167: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
969-969: Static analysis false positives: Environment keys are not sensitive.The Gitleaks tool has flagged multiple environment keys as potential API keys. These are false positives as these keys are:
- Internal configuration identifiers
- Not used for authentication
- Required by the system's architecture
- Generated deterministically based on the configuration
No action is required for these detections.
Also applies to: 975-975, 980-980, 986-986, 991-991, 997-997, 1003-1003, 1009-1009, 1014-1014, 1020-1020, 1025-1025, 1030-1030, 1035-1035, 1040-1040, 1046-1046, 1053-1053, 1058-1058, 1066-1066, 1072-1072, 1079-1079, 1085-1085, 1091-1091, 1097-1097, 1103-1103, 1109-1109, 1115-1115, 1121-1121, 1127-1127, 1133-1133, 1138-1138, 1143-1143, 1151-1151, 1159-1159, 1167-1167, 1176-1176, 1181-1181
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
969-969: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
12-12: Verify compatibility with major version updates.Several dependencies have been updated to newer versions, with some significant version jumps:
- git_aa: 2.34.1 -> 2.45.2 (major version jump)
- cargo_binstall_ghrel: v1.10.9 -> v1.10.21
- tar_aa: 1.34 -> 1.35
Please ensure that these updates, especially the major version jump in git_aa, don't introduce breaking changes that could affect the build process.
Run the following script to check for any compatibility issues:
Also applies to: 23-23, 29-29, 38-38, 50-50, 71-71, 83-83, 98-98, 107-107, 120-120, 132-132, 156-156, 168-168, 195-195, 252-252, 264-264, 288-288, 300-300, 342-342, 351-351, 377-377, 388-388, 519-519, 531-531, 555-555, 567-567, 640-640, 652-652, 696-696, 708-708
✅ Verification successful
Version updates are safe and follow semantic versioning
The version updates in
.ghjk/lock.jsonare routine maintenance changes:
- tar_aa: Minor version bump (1.34 -> 1.35)
- git_aa: Major version bump but with Git's backward compatibility guarantee
- cargo_binstall_ghrel: Minor version updates (v1.10.9 -> v1.10.21)
These are build tool dependencies with strong backward compatibility guarantees. The updates follow semantic versioning principles and are safe to apply.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with updated dependencies # Check git version compatibility git --version # Check cargo-binstall version cargo binstall --version # Check tar version tar --version # Look for any error patterns in recent builds that might indicate compatibility issues rg -i "error|failed|incompatible" .ghjk/logs/ || echo "No logs found or no issues detected"Length of output: 667
Natoandro
force-pushed
the
met-774-typegraph-upgrade
branch
from
5840d96 to
9427fb9
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #941 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.07% 78.04% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 154 157 +3
Lines 19099 19283 +184
Branches 1936 1944 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 14912 15049 +137
- Misses 4164 4211 +47
Partials 23 23 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tools/consts.ts (2)
Line range hint
20-95: Consider making version replacement patterns more robust.The
sedLockLinespatterns could benefit from more precise RegExp patterns to avoid unintended matches. Consider these improvements:
- Add word boundaries or more specific context where applicable
- Use non-capturing groups where possible
- Ensure consistent pattern structure for similar replacements
Example improvements:
- [/(\s*static\s*MT_VERSION:\s*&str\s*=\s*").+(";)/, CURRENT_VERSION], + [/(\s*static\s*MT_VERSION:\s*&str\s*=\s*")[\d\.-]+(";)/, CURRENT_VERSION], - ['(version = ").+(")', CURRENT_VERSION], + ['(version\s*=\s*")[\d\.-]+(")', CURRENT_VERSION],
91-94: Make JSR import pattern more specific.The current pattern for JSR imports might be too permissive. Consider making it more specific to version numbers to avoid unintended matches.
- /(import\s+.+\s+from "jsr:@typegraph\/sdk@)[^\/]+((?:\/.+)?";)/, + /(import\s+.+\s+from "jsr:@typegraph\/sdk@)[\d\.-]+((?:\/.+)?";)/,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
examples/templates/deno/api/example.ts(1 hunks)tools/consts.ts(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- examples/templates/deno/api/example.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: lint-compat (macos-14, aarch64-apple-darwin, false)
- GitHub Check: bulid-docker (linux/amd64, custom-ubuntu-large)
- GitHub Check: lint-compat (macos-13, x86_64-apple-darwin, false)
- GitHub Check: test-website
- GitHub Check: test-full
- GitHub Check: pre-commit
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tools/consts.ts (1)
4-6: Verify version consistency across the codebase.The version constants have been updated to reflect the progression from 0.4.10 to 0.5.0. Let's verify that these versions are consistently applied across the codebase.
Also applies to: 13-13
✅ Verification successful
Version constants are consistently applied across the codebase
The version progression from 0.4.10 to 0.5.0 is properly reflected in all relevant files, with appropriate version references in package manifests, SDK constants, and documentation. Previous version references are intentionally maintained in test files for compatibility testing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify version consistency across the codebase # Check for any remaining references to old version constants echo "Checking for old version constant references..." rg "METATYPE_VERSION|PUBLISHED_VERSION" -l # Check for version inconsistencies echo "Checking for version inconsistencies..." rg "0\.4\.10|0\.5\.0-rc\.9|0\.5\.0" --type-not lock --type-not json # Check TypeGraph version references echo "Checking TypeGraph version references..." rg "0\.0\.[34]" --type-not lock --type-not jsonLength of output: 6434
Migration notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes v0.5.0
Version Highlights
New Features
Improvements
Breaking Changes
METATYPE_VERSIONconstantCompatibility
Upgrade Recommendations