Skip to content

update package version for release 2.0 #25

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

MarkSackerberg
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
digital-asset-standard-api-js-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 29, 2025 3:21pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the package version to 2.0.0.
    • Removed duplicate fields and clarified the package description in the metadata.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the package version to 2.0.
    • Removed duplicate "name" field.
    • Added explicit "description" field in clients/js/package.json.

Walkthrough

The version number in the clients/js/package.json file was updated from "1.1.0-beta.1" to "2.0.0". The duplicate "name" field was removed, and a new "description" field was added with the value "Open-source specification for interacting with digital assets on Solana". No other changes were made to the file or to any other part of the project.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
clients/js/package.json Updated package version from 1.1.0-beta.1 to 2.0.0; removed duplicate "name" field; added explicit "description" field

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MarkSackerberg MarkSackerberg requested a review from danenbm April 29, 2025 15:08
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d6ad66 and 0c84d3c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • clients/js/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
clients/js/package.json (1)

1-79: Verify release artifacts and documentation
This PR introduces a new major release. Please confirm that:

  1. CHANGELOG.md (or equivalent) has been updated with the v2.0.0 changes.
  2. README and any user-facing docs reference the new version.
  3. Your release workflow (tags, GitHub Releases, CI/CD pipelines) is configured to publish v2.0.0 to npm.

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c84d3c and f9faf46.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • clients/js/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
clients/js/package.json (2)

4-4: Version updated to valid SemVer
The version has been bumped to "2.0.0", which now fully conforms to SemVer (major.minor.patch).


3-3: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate "name" field
Having two "name" keys is invalid and the latter will override the former. Remove the redundant duplicate entry to ensure valid JSON and avoid confusion.

Apply this diff:

@@ -2,3 +2,2 @@
     "name": "@metaplex-foundation/digital-asset-standard-api",
-    "name": "@metaplex-foundation/digital-asset-standard-api",

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

"version": "1.1.0-beta.1",
"name": "@metaplex-foundation/digital-asset-standard-api",
"version": "2.0.0",
"description": "Open-source specification for interacting with digital assets on Solana",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Deduplicate the "description" field
There are currently two "description" keys. Delete one to prevent key collisions and maintain a clean, valid JSON structure.

Example diff to collapse into a single entry:

@@ -5,3 +5,2 @@
     "version": "2.0.0",
-    "description": "Open-source specification for interacting with digital assets on Solana",
-    "description": "Open-source specification for interacting with digital assets on Solana",
+    "description": "Open-source specification for interacting with digital assets on Solana",

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@danenbm
Copy link
Contributor

danenbm commented Apr 29, 2025

Not needed as already automatically done by CI: 0899e07

@danenbm danenbm closed this Apr 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants