Skip to content

Enhance Component generation #733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

mrmerlin320
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes #

Notes for Reviewers

Signed commits

  • Yes, I signed my commits.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @mrmerlin320, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request enhances the component generation process by introducing a 'group' parameter to the GenerateComponents function in the Package interface and its implementations. This allows for filtering components based on a group, providing more control over which components are generated. The changes affect the artifacthub, github packages, the models interfaces, and the registry model, as well as the component generator utility.

Highlights

  • Group-based Component Filtering: Introduces a 'group' parameter to the GenerateComponents function, enabling filtering of components based on their group.
  • Interface Modification: Updates the Package interface to include the 'group' parameter in the GenerateComponents function signature.
  • GitHub Package Changes: Modifies the GitHub package to incorporate group-based filtering logic during component generation.
  • Model CSV Update: Adds a 'Group' field to the ModelCSV struct in the registry model to store group information.

Changelog

Click here to see the changelog
  • generators/artifacthub/package.go
    • Modified the GenerateComponents function to accept a 'group' parameter.
  • generators/artifacthub/package_test.go
    • Updated the test case to pass an empty string as the 'group' parameter to GenerateComponents.
  • generators/github/package.go
    • Modified the GenerateComponents function to accept a 'group' parameter.
    • Added logic to filter components based on the 'group' parameter using the IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup function.
    • The filtering logic is applied before generating components from CRDs.
  • generators/github/package_test.go
    • Updated the test case to pass an empty string as the 'group' parameter to GenerateComponents.
  • generators/github/url.go
    • Added imports for fmt and commented out unused imports.
    • Added logic to process manifest files (.yml, .yaml) directly.
    • Modified GetContent to handle manifest files and return a GitHubPackage.
  • generators/models/interfaces.go
    • Modified the GenerateComponents function in the Package interface to accept a 'group' parameter.
  • registry/model.go
    • Added a 'Group' field to the ModelCSV struct.
    • Modified NewModelCSVHelper to handle potential errors when downloading the CSV file.
    • Modified GenerateComponentsFromPkg to pass an empty string as the group.
    • Modified InvokeGenerationFromSheet to pass the model.Group value to the GenerateComponents function.
    • Added a print statement for debugging purposes.
    • Commented out the ProcessRelationships function call.
  • utils/component/generator.go
    • Added the IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup function to determine whether to include a component based on its group.
    • Modified the Generate function to extract the group from the CRD.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A function's form,
With parameters warm,
'Group' joins the fray,
Components hold sway,
Filtering starts the norm.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces a new 'group' parameter to the GenerateComponents function, allowing for filtering of components based on their group. This enhancement improves the flexibility and granularity of component generation. The changes seem well-structured and the addition of the IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup function in utils/component/generator.go is a good approach for filtering. However, there are a few areas that could be improved for clarity and robustness.

Summary of Findings

  • Error Handling in IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup: The IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup function in utils/component/generator.go currently ignores the error returned by extractCueValueFromPath. It's important to handle this error to ensure that component filtering works correctly and to provide informative error messages when the group cannot be extracted.
  • Missing Error Handling in GenerateComponentsFromPkg: The GenerateComponentsFromPkg function in registry/model.go calls pkg.GenerateComponents("") which passes an empty string as the group. It would be better to pass the group from the model, to allow for filtering of components based on the group.
  • Unused Imports: There are some unused imports in generators/github/url.go that should be removed to keep the code clean.
  • Console Print Statements: There are console print statements in generators/github/url.go and registry/model.go that should be replaced with proper logging.
  • Commented out code: There is commented out code in generators/github/url.go and registry/model.go that should be removed to keep the code clean.

Merge Readiness

The pull request is a good step towards enhancing component generation. However, the error handling in IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup should be addressed, and the unused imports and console print statements should be removed. Additionally, the commented out code should be removed. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that it not be merged until these issues are addressed (at a minimum), and that others review and approve this code before merging.

Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@leecalcote leecalcote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On this PR, review comments from Gemini code assist are worth explicitly accepting or rejecting.

Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
@aabidsofi19 aabidsofi19 merged commit 1f8a253 into meshery:master May 12, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants