-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
Enhance Component generation #733
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @mrmerlin320, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request enhances the component generation process by introducing a 'group' parameter to the GenerateComponents
function in the Package
interface and its implementations. This allows for filtering components based on a group, providing more control over which components are generated. The changes affect the artifacthub
, github
packages, the models
interfaces, and the registry
model, as well as the component generator utility.
Highlights
- Group-based Component Filtering: Introduces a 'group' parameter to the
GenerateComponents
function, enabling filtering of components based on their group. - Interface Modification: Updates the
Package
interface to include the 'group' parameter in theGenerateComponents
function signature. - GitHub Package Changes: Modifies the GitHub package to incorporate group-based filtering logic during component generation.
- Model CSV Update: Adds a 'Group' field to the ModelCSV struct in the registry model to store group information.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- generators/artifacthub/package.go
- Modified the
GenerateComponents
function to accept a 'group' parameter.
- Modified the
- generators/artifacthub/package_test.go
- Updated the test case to pass an empty string as the 'group' parameter to
GenerateComponents
.
- Updated the test case to pass an empty string as the 'group' parameter to
- generators/github/package.go
- Modified the
GenerateComponents
function to accept a 'group' parameter. - Added logic to filter components based on the 'group' parameter using the
IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup
function. - The filtering logic is applied before generating components from CRDs.
- Modified the
- generators/github/package_test.go
- Updated the test case to pass an empty string as the 'group' parameter to
GenerateComponents
.
- Updated the test case to pass an empty string as the 'group' parameter to
- generators/github/url.go
- Added imports for
fmt
and commented out unused imports. - Added logic to process manifest files (.yml, .yaml) directly.
- Modified
GetContent
to handle manifest files and return aGitHubPackage
.
- Added imports for
- generators/models/interfaces.go
- Modified the
GenerateComponents
function in thePackage
interface to accept a 'group' parameter.
- Modified the
- registry/model.go
- Added a 'Group' field to the
ModelCSV
struct. - Modified
NewModelCSVHelper
to handle potential errors when downloading the CSV file. - Modified
GenerateComponentsFromPkg
to pass an empty string as the group. - Modified
InvokeGenerationFromSheet
to pass themodel.Group
value to theGenerateComponents
function. - Added a print statement for debugging purposes.
- Commented out the
ProcessRelationships
function call.
- Added a 'Group' field to the
- utils/component/generator.go
- Added the
IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup
function to determine whether to include a component based on its group. - Modified the
Generate
function to extract the group from the CRD.
- Added the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A function's form,
With parameters warm,
'Group' joins the fray,
Components hold sway,
Filtering starts the norm.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces a new 'group' parameter to the GenerateComponents function, allowing for filtering of components based on their group. This enhancement improves the flexibility and granularity of component generation. The changes seem well-structured and the addition of the IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup function in utils/component/generator.go
is a good approach for filtering. However, there are a few areas that could be improved for clarity and robustness.
Summary of Findings
- Error Handling in
IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup
: TheIncludeComponentBasedOnGroup
function inutils/component/generator.go
currently ignores the error returned byextractCueValueFromPath
. It's important to handle this error to ensure that component filtering works correctly and to provide informative error messages when the group cannot be extracted. - Missing Error Handling in
GenerateComponentsFromPkg
: TheGenerateComponentsFromPkg
function inregistry/model.go
callspkg.GenerateComponents("")
which passes an empty string as the group. It would be better to pass the group from the model, to allow for filtering of components based on the group. - Unused Imports: There are some unused imports in
generators/github/url.go
that should be removed to keep the code clean. - Console Print Statements: There are console print statements in
generators/github/url.go
andregistry/model.go
that should be replaced with proper logging. - Commented out code: There is commented out code in
generators/github/url.go
andregistry/model.go
that should be removed to keep the code clean.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is a good step towards enhancing component generation. However, the error handling in IncludeComponentBasedOnGroup
should be addressed, and the unused imports and console print statements should be removed. Additionally, the commented out code should be removed. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that it not be merged until these issues are addressed (at a minimum), and that others review and approve this code before merging.
Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On this PR, review comments from Gemini code assist are worth explicitly accepting or rejecting.
Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mrmerlin320 <[email protected]>
Description
This PR fixes #
Notes for Reviewers
Signed commits