feat: rely solely on metadata name

[j-zimnowoda]

APL-612

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔴	Statements	47.96% (-0.22% 🔻)	1000/2085
🔴	Branches	31.48% (+0.18% 🔼)	193/613
🔴	Functions	38.49% (+0.56% 🔼)	112/291
🔴	Lines	47.19% (-0.24% 🔻)	881/1867

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🔴	common/crypt.ts	20.16% (-0.16% 🔻)	12.5% (-0.4% 🔻)	14.29%	19.35% (-0.16% 🔻)
🔴	common/repo.ts	46.29% (-4.03% 🔻)	40% (-4.44% 🔻)	35.48% (+2.15% 🔼)	46.75% (-4.25% 🔻)

Test suite run success

89 tests passing in 9 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from fbb81cd

[merll]

Apart from my small comment above, I would say LGTM. I made some similar adjustments to repo.ts in the APL-706 PR for improving the error handling. Also we might want to adopt the sanity checks for kind, name and team id in regard to the file paths. However, this can be done when we move these things to a library.