Skip to content

feat[periphery]: improve trove helper #588

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

feat[periphery]: improve trove helper #588

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

tserg
Copy link
Collaborator

@tserg tserg commented Jun 13, 2024

Following @kseikyo 's request for the return data of frontend_data_provider.get_trove_assets_info() to include the trove ID and trove owner address, I have added a new TroveInfo type with this information.

I have updated the devnet deployment addresses and devnet dump file as well (I had to redeploy devnet as I did not have the original state file). Once approved, I will redeploy the frontend data provider on Sepolia (upgrade would not work since we now need to pass the abbot address into the constructor).

@tserg tserg marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2024 06:45
@tserg tserg requested review from milancermak and kseikyo June 13, 2024 06:45
Copy link
Contributor

@milancermak milancermak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tserg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tserg commented Jun 13, 2024

I have added the following members to TroveInfo struct and verified it is working on devnet:

  1. health
  2. max_forge_amt
  3. is_liquidatable
  4. is_absorbable

Ready for another round of review.

@tserg tserg requested review from milancermak and kseikyo June 13, 2024 14:03
@tserg tserg merged commit 6a25785 into main Jun 14, 2024
1 check passed
@tserg tserg deleted the feat/fdp_retdata branch June 14, 2024 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants