Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lens 2022.11.251411-latest broke extension top bar item layout #6658

Closed
stefcameron opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #6706
Closed

Lens 2022.11.251411-latest broke extension top bar item layout #6658

stefcameron opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #6706
Assignees
Labels
area/ui bug Something isn't working

Comments

@stefcameron
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

After getting auto-upgraded to this version of Lens, the MCC Extension's top bar button layout has changed.

Here's what it is now (bad):
image

Here's what it was before (good):
https://github.com/Mirantis/lens-extension-cc/blob/master/README.md#adding-your-first-management-cluster
image

Something in the CSS resulted in an issue with the width of the item such that we now have to set a hard width on our item, whereas we didn't before. Setting width: 130px on our item resolves the problem.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Upgrade Lens to 2022.11.251411-latest
  2. Install MCC Extension
  3. Observe the top bar item.

Environment (please complete the following information):

  • Lens Version: 2022.11.251411-latest
  • OS: macOS 12.6.1
  • Installation method (e.g. snap or AppImage in Linux): dmg
@Nokel81
Copy link
Collaborator

Nokel81 commented Nov 28, 2022

@aleksfront Do you know what could have caused this?

@aleksfront
Copy link
Contributor

@stefcameron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aleksfront Thank you for the fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ui bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants