Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix Unicode Escape Characters #15318

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2025

Conversation

hieheihei
Copy link
Contributor

@hieheihei hieheihei commented Mar 9, 2025

Summary

Fixes #14673

Tip

Close issue syntax: Fixes #<issue number> or Resolves #<issue number>, see documentation for more details.

Screenshots

Before After

Checklist

Important

Please review the checklist below before submitting your pull request.

  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document
  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. 🐞 bug Something isn't working labels Mar 9, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Mar 10, 2025
@crazywoola crazywoola merged commit a8b6008 into langgenius:main Mar 10, 2025
6 checks passed
jackzhuo pushed a commit to jackzhuo/dify that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2025
parambharat pushed a commit to parambharat/dify that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐞 bug Something isn't working lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The LLM does not get the contents of the document extractor correctly
2 participants