Skip to content

Add exceptions from v1.33 Code freeze #2753

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this:

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Documenting the Code freeze exception requests received in the v1.33 release cycle, after code and test freeze was in place.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

cc: @npolshakova @neoaggelos

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority area/release-team Issues or PRs related to the release-team subproject labels Mar 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 26, 2025
codeFreeze:

- name: "DRA: structured parameters"
issue: 4381
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’m not entirely sure, but I followed the exception request (here) that was raised to gather the details for the PR and KEP number.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given the justification given in exception request about moving from beta to GA, that would correspond to KEP-4381, while the other KEP-4816 mentioned in the code PR is still in alpha for this release.

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat requested a review from npolshakova April 8, 2025 21:28
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dipesh-rawat, npolshakova

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e0e0853 into kubernetes:master Apr 11, 2025
2 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.33 milestone Apr 11, 2025
@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat deleted the add-code-freeze-exceptions branch April 11, 2025 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release-team Issues or PRs related to the release-team subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants