Skip to content

etcd: Build 3.5.3-0 image #109470

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

serathius
Copy link
Contributor

/sig release
/kind bug

NONE

/assign @dims

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Apr 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. labels Apr 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from jpbetz and spiffxp April 13, 2022 19:29
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 13, 2022

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 13, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 13, 2022

cc @kubernetes/release-team

we'll need to treat this as an item for release. we can't be using 3.6.0-alpha.0 as it was before and we switch to 3.5.3 which was released this morning. (this is the one where several data corruption issues were fixed)

https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/releases/tag/v3.5.3
etcd-io/etcd@v3.5.2...v3.5.3

NOTE: after we build an image with this PR, we will be updating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/build/dependencies.yaml#L58 as well in a subsequent PR

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 13, 2022

/priority critical-urgent

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 13, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 13, 2022

/milestone v1.24

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.24 milestone Apr 13, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 13, 2022

/hold for release team

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 13, 2022
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 13, 2022
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Apr 13, 2022

this is for tests only, right?

does kubeadm have a corresponding change to make to pick up 3.5.3? my read of

SupportedEtcdVersion = map[uint8]string{
13: "3.2.24",
14: "3.3.10",
15: "3.3.10",
16: "3.3.17-0",
17: "3.4.3-0",
18: "3.4.3-0",
19: "3.4.13-0",
20: "3.4.13-0",
21: "3.4.13-0",
22: "3.5.1-0",
23: "3.5.1-0",
}
is that 1.22+ will use the known-bad 3.5.1 version by default

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 13, 2022

@neolit123 can you please add a PR to bump kubeadm to 3.5.3? (see note from @liggitt above)

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Apr 13, 2022

I agree we should not be using 3.6.0-alpha.0 or 3.5.2 in this image. I don't have a clear understanding of how important it is to get this PR in for 1.24 if the cluster/images/etcd image is only being used in kube CI

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

/hold found some more things that need fixing...

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

does kubeadm have a corresponding change to make to pick up 3.5.3? my read of

@neolit123 can you please add a PR to bump kubeadm to 3.5.3? (see note from @liggitt above)

yep, i can do that later today.

justaugustus and others added 2 commits April 13, 2022 16:23
- debian-base:bullseye-v1.2.0
- debian-iptables:bullseye-v1.3.0
- setcap:bullseye-v1.2.0

Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Augustus <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. area/conformance Issues or PRs related to kubernetes conformance tests area/test sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, justaugustus, serathius

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

not sure if you were referring to my comment about kubeadm, but I wasn't expecting that change in this PR... just noting the other in-repo use I knew of

@liggitt -- Nope, I noticed that we were not using the:

  1. latest versions of the debian-base images --> cddd83c
  2. golang version that was used in the etcd v3.5.3 release --> b0f3f01 (ref: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/0452feec719fa8ad88ae343e66e9bb222965d75d/Makefile#L58)

/hold cancel
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Apr 13, 2022
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

does kubeadm have a corresponding change to make to pick up 3.5.3? my read of

@neolit123 can you please add a PR to bump kubeadm to 3.5.3? (see note from @liggitt above)

yep, i can do that later today.

@dims @neolit123 -- Here's part of it: #109471 (not sure of the other kubeadm things that may need to happen elsewhere...)

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

cc: @kubernetes/release-team-leads

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

@dims @neolit123 -- Here's part of it: #109471 (not sure of the other kubeadm things that may need to happen elsewhere...)

thanks for sending the PR!

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

thanks for sending the PR!

No worries! Just give me a heads-up if there's anything missing from it.
I did my best guesses on what needed to be bumped.

@justaugustus justaugustus changed the title Build etcd v3.5.3 image etcd: Build 3.5.3-0 image Apr 13, 2022
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel

@leilajal
Copy link
Contributor

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/conformance Issues or PRs related to kubernetes conformance tests area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants