-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.4k
etcd: Build 3.5.3-0 image #109470
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
etcd: Build 3.5.3-0 image #109470
Conversation
/approve |
cc @kubernetes/release-team we'll need to treat this as an item for release. we can't be using https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/releases/tag/v3.5.3 NOTE: after we build an image with this PR, we will be updating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/build/dependencies.yaml#L58 as well in a subsequent PR |
/priority critical-urgent |
/milestone v1.24 |
/hold for release team |
/lgtm |
this is for tests only, right? does kubeadm have a corresponding change to make to pick up 3.5.3? my read of kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/constants/constants.go Lines 491 to 503 in 75e49ec
|
@neolit123 can you please add a PR to bump kubeadm to 3.5.3? (see note from @liggitt above) |
I agree we should not be using 3.6.0-alpha.0 or 3.5.2 in this image. I don't have a clear understanding of how important it is to get this PR in for 1.24 if the cluster/images/etcd image is only being used in kube CI |
/hold found some more things that need fixing... |
yep, i can do that later today. |
- debian-base:bullseye-v1.2.0 - debian-iptables:bullseye-v1.3.0 - setcap:bullseye-v1.2.0 Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Augustus <[email protected]>
a977c66
to
b0f3f01
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims, justaugustus, serathius The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@liggitt -- Nope, I noticed that we were not using the:
/hold cancel |
@dims @neolit123 -- Here's part of it: #109471 (not sure of the other kubeadm things that may need to happen elsewhere...) |
cc: @kubernetes/release-team-leads |
thanks for sending the PR! |
No worries! Just give me a heads-up if there's anything missing from it. |
/test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel |
/triage accepted |
/sig release
/kind bug
/assign @dims