Skip to content

Remove duplicated label in helm chart: app.kubernetes.io/instance #354

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

DiegoLelis
Copy link
Contributor

@DiegoLelis DiegoLelis commented Jan 29, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it

Changes the behaviour of a couple of functions and introduces 2 other functions to make sure the label app.kubernetes.io/instance is not set twice.
Also fixed the typo on the certificate file name.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #353

Special notes for your reviewer

The previous behaviour added the label app.kubernetes.io/instance twice on a few resources.
I've tried to keep changes minimal, and to respect the previous design to the best of my ability.
Kept all the previous labels, only removed the duplicated ones.
When choosing to remove between the more generic label, and the more specific one, I choose to deprecate the more generic one.
Tested installing on my cluster with default values and it works.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Removes duplicated label `app.kubernetes.io/instance` from helm chart.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 29, 2025

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @DiegoLelis!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/lws 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/lws has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @DiegoLelis. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 29, 2025
@DiegoLelis
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @Edwinhr716

@Edwinhr716
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 30, 2025
@Edwinhr716
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
makes sense to me to keep the label set in the resources instead

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2025
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Jan 31, 2025

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g, DiegoLelis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 31, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 34422e7 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 31, 2025
9 checks passed
@kerthcet kerthcet mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2025
19 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Duplicated label in helm chart: app.kubernetes.io/instance
4 participants