Skip to content

✨ Bump CAPI to v1.8.1, Helm to v3.15.3, and Go version to 1.22.5 #272

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 25, 2024

Conversation

Jont828
Copy link
Contributor

@Jont828 Jont828 commented Jul 31, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 31, 2024
@Jont828 Jont828 force-pushed the capi-1.8 branch 2 times, most recently from 827584e to 54be6b8 Compare August 14, 2024 20:26
@Jont828 Jont828 changed the title [WIP] Bump CAPI to v1.8 beta and Helm to v3.15.3 Bump CAPI to v1.8 beta and Helm to v3.15.3 Aug 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 14, 2024
@Jont828 Jont828 changed the title Bump CAPI to v1.8 beta and Helm to v3.15.3 Bump CAPI to v1.8.1, Helm to v3.15.3, and Go version to 1.22.5 Aug 14, 2024
@Jont828 Jont828 changed the title Bump CAPI to v1.8.1, Helm to v3.15.3, and Go version to 1.22.5 ✨ Bump CAPI to v1.8.1, Helm to v3.15.3, and Go version to 1.22.5 Aug 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma mboersma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Jont828, mboersma

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

/hold
For squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 21, 2024
@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

/label tide/merge-method-squash
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Aug 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a0bd6fa into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 25, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants