Skip to content

RMLIOREGTC0004o, RMLIOREGTC0004t, RMLIOREGTC0004w and similar: Value conversions needed? #37

Open
@elsdvlee

Description

@elsdvlee

The expected output expresses the numerical value in for the property amount as exponential notation while the value in the database is in normal notation. For example, these cases expect "2.0E1" while the value being extracted from the databases is "20.0". It should be clear if the engines have to convert the values like "20.0" to its exponential notation or leaving it as is enough since both represent the same value.

Test cases concerned are RMLIOREGTC0004o, RMLIOREGTC0004t, RMLIOREGTC0004w, RMLIOREGTC0005o, RMLIOREGTC0005t, RMLIOREGTC0005w, RMLIOREGTC0006o, RMLIOREGTC0006t, RMLIOREGTC0006w

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions