Skip to content

Adding endOfDay getter #73

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

FMorschel
Copy link
Collaborator

@FMorschel FMorschel commented Sep 20, 2024

Here is the new end of day getter to work with the date getter.

More context at #69

@FMorschel FMorschel requested a review from jogboms September 20, 2024 21:19
@FMorschel FMorschel self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.85%. Comparing base (97e34f5) to head (d82cf27).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #73   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.85%   99.85%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         679      691   +12     
=======================================
+ Hits          678      690   +12     
  Misses          1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Owner

@jogboms jogboms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm-f1affd

@jogboms jogboms merged commit 2aeb17c into jogboms:master Nov 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@FMorschel FMorschel deleted the end-of-day-getter branch November 18, 2024 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants