-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replaces Raceway scene with one that opens in the SDK. Deleted redund… #308
Merged
Merged
Changes from 14 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8b18882
Replaces Raceway scene with one that opens in the SDK. Deleted redund…
neph1 cbb76e1
Merge branch 'master' into 278-raceway
neph1 e9370dd
fixes erroneous transform of race track
neph1 07af864
raceway without RBC
neph1 07345da
Revert "Immediate updates AssetManager static hack to load textures i…
neph1 73aa6bd
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:neph1/sdk
neph1 388ae05
Merge origin/master
neph1 0f521a3
Merge origin/master
neph1 601de21
Merge origin/master
neph1 e8045b8
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:neph1/sdk
neph1 0bf8e42
Merge origin/master
neph1 c39bed7
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:neph1/sdk
neph1 ead0e50
Merge branch 'master' into 278-raceway
neph1 0873f31
new raceway
neph1 e4b7443
removed RBC's. Individual checks and generation at runtime
neph1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file removed
BIN
-28.1 KB
jme3-vehicle-creator/src/Models/Racetrack/SandDesert_StartTower.png
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if we'd want individual if's here? Though that would look ugly and be broken use-cases, I guess.
If we know that the Raceway.j3o doesn't have any RBCs at all anymore (which is very likely, considering we don't have them in blender and probably it would need a gltf extension anyway), we can probably also remove the if clause.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But I've added them manually to the j3o. So in that case the whole clause could be removed. Or should I remove them from the j3o and generate every time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh. I mean if they'd be dynamically generated, then we'd probably get rid of the problem that caused #278.
Otherwise, we may have another breakage when/if physics is changing again.
I guess both ways are fine for now though, especially since you already had the work to add it as well.
Do you see any downsides with code adding them though? any tweeks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're to keep the lines generating the RBC's (and keep the j3o with the RBC's) I think it would also be better to do a check first. Or how would it handle generating a new control if there already is one?