Skip to content

gc is actually repo gc, reflect in docs #897

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2015
Merged

gc is actually repo gc, reflect in docs #897

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2015

Conversation

anarcat
Copy link
Contributor

@anarcat anarcat commented Mar 8, 2015

not exactly elegant, but fixes #871 in the short term. in the mid term, unless more repo commands show up, i suggest just replacing repo gc simply by gc.

not exactly elegant, but fixes #871 in the short term. in the mid term, unless more `repo` commands show up, i suggest just replacing `repo gc` simply by `gc`.
@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Mar 9, 2015

great, thanks! agreed with @anarcat -- once we have more repo commands we can worry about making a section

jbenet added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2015
`gc` is actually `repo gc`, reflect in docs
@jbenet jbenet merged commit 2274b93 into ipfs:master Mar 9, 2015
@anarcat anarcat deleted the patch-1 branch March 10, 2015 01:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ipfs gc should be ipfs repo gc
3 participants