-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 547
fix: improve other_products #2579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
2a3b625
to
baa8ea8
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2579 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 75.04% 83.00% +7.96%
==========================================
Files 596 598 +2
Lines 9736 9874 +138
Branches 1152 1354 +202
==========================================
+ Hits 7306 8196 +890
+ Misses 2123 1343 -780
- Partials 307 335 +28
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
6319f57
to
0b93c00
Compare
- Raise an error if one of the other_products is not found in the product list - Do not always append kerberos to all_the_tests (kerberos package_test_data will be provided by intel#2509) - Drop gcc, glibc, rust, sqlite, zlib, etc. from other_products if needed Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <[email protected]>
0b93c00
to
bd414b4
Compare
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ | |||
prod_list.append(i["product"]) | |||
for i in prod_list: | |||
all_the_tests.append(i) | |||
all_the_tests.append("kerberos") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked about this in code review and I gather we need this because kerberos was missing some test data and wasn't getting automatically appended. Since I can't easily edit deleted lines from the code review interface, I think instead I'll open up a new issue to fix whatever's up with kerberos.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've opened #2594 to address the kerberos issue more correctly. This otherwise looks good and I'm going to merge it now.
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine [email protected]