test(available-fix): mock cve data

[BreadGenie]

fix #1503

[BreadGenie]

hmm should we move these mock data to a separate file?

[BreadGenie]

should I revert #1512 in this PR?

[terriko]

Yeah, might as well revert #1512 now that the tests don't use external data. Or if you prefer, keep a copy of the old external test and leave that in LONG_TESTS?

[terriko]

Also, you might want to rebase from main to get the other LONG_TESTS fix and see if that clears up CI.

Other than that, looks good. I'll need to remember to add pytest-mock to our licensing request for 3.1, but it's MIT so I don't anticipate any problem.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1513 (436cdfd) into main (9934aed) will increase coverage by 1.12%.
The diff coverage is 64.81%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1513      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.27%   80.39%   +1.12%     
==========================================
  Files         281      281              
  Lines        5548     5571      +23     
  Branches      905      908       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         4398     4479      +81     
+ Misses        966      897      -69     
- Partials      184      195      +11     

Flag	Coverage Δ
longtests	80.39% <64.81%> (+1.12%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cve_bin_tool/available_fix/debian_cve_tracker.py	78.00% <53.33%> (+42.58%)	⬆️
test/test_available_fix.py	76.47% <69.23%> (+19.80%)	⬆️
cve_bin_tool/available_fix/__init__.py	82.05% <0.00%> (+23.07%)	⬆️
cve_bin_tool/available_fix/redhat_cve_tracker.py	70.68% <0.00%> (+48.27%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9934aed...436cdfd. Read the comment docs.

[BreadGenie]

I've kept the old tests in LONG_TESTS

[terriko]

Whoops, thought I'd merged this earlier, but apparently not. Will do so now. Thank you again for getting this set up; I think it'll provide a baseline for moving a few other things to use mock eventually too.