feat(remote-config): add support for multiple components of the same type, and change from hard to soft delete #1846

instamenta · 2025-04-15T08:59:16Z

Description

Changed remote config names to be indexes which are indexes

Related Issues

Closes refactor remote config logic so the components name's are always unique, change logic from hard delete to soft delete for components #1822

Pull request (PR) checklist

This PR added tests (unit, integration, and/or end-to-end)
This PR updated documentation
This PR added no TODOs or commented out code
This PR has no breaking changes
Any technical debt has been documented as a separate issue and linked to this PR
Any package.json changes have been explained to and approved by a repository manager
All related issues have been linked to this PR
All changes in this PR are included in the description
When this PR merges the commits will be squashed and the title will be used as the commit message, the 'commit message guidelines' below have been followed

Testing

This PR added unit tests
This PR added integration/end-to-end tests
These changes required manual testing that is documented below
Anything not tested is documented

Commit message guidelines

We use 'Conventional Commits' to ensure that our commit messages are easy to read, follow a consistent format, and for automated release note generation. Please follow the guidelines below when writing your commit messages:

BREAKING CHANGE: a commit that has a footer BREAKING CHANGE:, or appends a ! after the type/scope, introduces a breaking API change (correlating with MAJOR in Semantic Versioning). A BREAKING CHANGE can be part of commits of any type. NOTE: currently breaking changes will only bump the MAJOR version.
The title is prefixed with one of the following:

Prefix	Description	Semantic Version Update	Captured in Release Notes
feat:	a new feature	MINOR	Yes
fix:	a bug fix	PATCH	Yes
perf:	performance	PATCH	Yes
refactor:	code change that isn't feature or fix	none	No
test:	adding missing tests	none	No
docs:	changes to documentation	none	Yes
build:	changes to build process	none	No
ci:	changes to CI configuration	none	No
style:	formatting, missing semi-colons, etc	none	No
chore:	updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change	none	No

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

…-config-logic-so-the-components-names-are-always-unique-change-logic-from-hard-delete-to-soft-delete-for-components # Conflicts: # src/core/config/remote/components/consensus-node-component.ts # src/core/config/remote/components/relay-component.ts # src/core/config/remote/remote-config-manager.ts

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

github-actions · 2025-04-15T09:01:35Z

Unit Test Results - Linux

32 tests ±0 32 ✅ ±0 0s ⏱️ ±0s
16 suites ±0 0 💤 ±0
1 files ±0 0 ❌ ±0

Results for commit 05ffff4. ± Comparison against base commit 1a51877.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

github-actions · 2025-04-15T09:03:07Z

Unit Test Results - Windows

1 files ± 0 73 suites - 12 4s ⏱️ ±0s
279 tests - 81 279 ✅ - 81 0 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0
283 runs - 82 283 ✅ - 82 0 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0

Results for commit 05ffff4. ± Comparison against base commit 1a51877.

This pull request removes 89 and adds 8 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

calling toObject() should return a valid data ‑ ConsensusNodeComponent calling toObject() should return a valid data
calling toObject() should return a valid data ‑ EnvoyProxyComponent calling toObject() should return a valid data
calling toObject() should return a valid data ‑ HaProxyComponent calling toObject() should return a valid data
calling toObject() should return a valid data ‑ MirrorNodeComponent calling toObject() should return a valid data
calling toObject() should return a valid data ‑ MirrorNodeExplorerComponent calling toObject() should return a valid data
calling toObject() should return a valid data ‑ RelayComponent calling toObject() should return a valid data
should be able to add new command to history with addCommandToHistory() ‑ RemoteConfigDataWrapper should be able to add new command to history with addCommandToHistory()
should be able to add new component with the .add() method ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should be able to add new component with the .add() method
should be able to create a instance ‑ RemoteConfigDataWrapper should be able to create a instance
should be able to create new instance of the class with valid data ‑ Migration should be able to create new instance of the class with valid data
…

should be able to add new component with the .addNewComponent() method ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should be able to add new component with the .addNewComponent() method
should be able to change node state with the .changeNodeState(() ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should be able to change node state with the .changeNodeState(()
should be able to get components with .getComponent() ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should be able to get components with .getComponent()
should be able to remove component with the .removeComponent() ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should be able to remove component with the .removeComponent()
should fail if trying to get component that doesn't exist with .getComponent() ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should fail if trying to get component that doesn't exist with .getComponent()
should not be able to add new component with the .addNewComponent() method if it already exist ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should not be able to add new component with the .addNewComponent() method if it already exist
should not be able to edit component with the .editComponent() if it doesn't exist  ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should not be able to edit component with the .editComponent() if it doesn't exist 
should not be able to remove component with the .removeComponent() if it doesn't exist  ‑ ComponentsDataWrapper should not be able to remove component with the .removeComponent() if it doesn't exist

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

github-actions · 2025-04-15T09:36:05Z

E2E Test Report

17 files ±0 120 suites +1 1h 30m 29s ⏱️ + 2m 34s
314 tests +4 314 ✅ +4 0 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0
330 runs +4 330 ✅ +4 0 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0

Results for commit 3292683. ± Comparison against base commit 0088b76.

This pull request removes 12 and adds 16 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus Nodes validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Envoy Proxies validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator HaProxies validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror Node Components validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror Node Explorers validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Relays validation should fail if component is not present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus Nodes validation should succeed if component is present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Envoy Proxies validation should succeed if component is present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator HaProxies validation should succeed if component is present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror Node Components validation should succeed if component is present
…

Should not validate consensus nodes if skipConsensusNodes is enabled ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate consensus nodes if skipConsensusNodes is enabled
Should not validate consensus nodes if status is non-deployed  ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate consensus nodes if status is non-deployed 
Should not validate consensus nodes if status is requested  ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate consensus nodes if status is requested 
Should not validate disabled components ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate disabled components
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus node validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Envoy proxy validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator HaProxy validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror node explorer validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror node validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Relay validation should fail if component is not present
…

github-actions · 2025-04-15T09:36:05Z

E2E Test Report

17 files ±0 120 suites +1 1h 25m 17s ⏱️ - 1m 52s
313 tests +3 313 ✅ +3 0 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0
329 runs +3 329 ✅ +3 0 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0

Results for commit 3788778. ± Comparison against base commit 484f219.

This pull request removes 12 and adds 15 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus Nodes validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Envoy Proxies validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator HaProxies validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror Node Components validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror Node Explorers validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Relays validation should fail if component is not present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus Nodes validation should succeed if component is present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Envoy Proxies validation should succeed if component is present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator HaProxies validation should succeed if component is present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror Node Components validation should succeed if component is present
…

Should not validate consensus nodes if skipConsensusNodes is enabled ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate consensus nodes if skipConsensusNodes is enabled
Should not validate consensus nodes if status is requested  ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate consensus nodes if status is requested 
Should not validate consensus nodes if status is stopped  ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Additional test cases Should not validate consensus nodes if status is stopped 
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus node validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Envoy proxy validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator HaProxy validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror node explorer validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Mirror node validation should fail if component is not present
should fail if component is not present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Relay validation should fail if component is not present
should succeed if component is present ‑ RemoteConfigValidator Consensus node validation should succeed if component is present
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

codacy-production · 2025-04-15T09:36:23Z

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ -0.17% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 92.18%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (`484f219`)	34816	28961	83.18%
Head commit (`3788778`)	34818 (+2)	28902 (-59)	83.01% (-0.17%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#1846)	895	825	92.18%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

codecov · 2025-04-15T09:37:31Z

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.73184% with 74 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.97%. Comparing base (484f219) to head (3788778).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/core/config/remote/components-data-wrapper.ts	87.37%	25 Missing ⚠️
src/commands/explorer.ts	55.55%	20 Missing ⚠️
src/commands/mirror-node.ts	43.47%	13 Missing ⚠️
src/commands/node/tasks.ts	79.16%	5 Missing ⚠️
...data/schema/model/remote/state/relay-node-state.ts	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...rc/core/config/remote/components/base-component.ts	92.85%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/commands/node/handlers.ts	98.14%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/core/chart-manager.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...c/core/config/remote/components/relay-component.ts	95.83%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1846      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.18%   81.97%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files         243      245       +2     
  Lines       34816    34818       +2     
  Branches     2956     2303     -653     
==========================================
- Hits        28612    28543      -69     
- Misses       6051     6165     +114     
+ Partials      153      110      -43

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/commands/deployment.ts	`68.06% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/commands/network.ts	`79.22% <100.00%> (-0.80%)`	⬇️
src/commands/relay.ts	`85.83% <100.00%> (+0.27%)`	⬆️
src/core/config-manager.ts	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
src/core/config/remote/cluster.ts	`76.00% <100.00%> (-18.37%)`	⬇️
...rc/core/config/remote/common-flags-data-wrapper.ts	`80.35% <100.00%> (ø)`
...core/config/remote/components/component-factory.ts	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...nfig/remote/components/consensus-node-component.ts	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
.../config/remote/components/envoy-proxy-component.ts	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...ore/config/remote/components/ha-proxy-component.ts	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
... and 23 more

... and 72 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

…-config-logic-so-the-components-names-are-always-unique-change-logic-from-hard-delete-to-soft-delete-for-components

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

…ross commands' Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

… on RelayComponent to consensusNodeIds, removed nodeStates on ConsensusNodeComponent Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

…-config-logic-so-the-components-names-are-always-unique-change-logic-from-hard-delete-to-soft-delete-for-components # Conflicts: # src/business/runtime-state/local-config-runtime-state.ts # src/core/dependency-injection/container-init.ts # src/data/backend/impl/yaml-config-map-storage-backend.ts # test/unit/data/configuration/impl/local-config-source.test.ts # test/unit/data/schema/migration/impl/remote/remote-config-v1-migration.test.ts # test/unit/data/schema/model/local/local-config.test.ts # test/unit/data/schema/model/remote/remote-config.test.ts

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

…oad() the source Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

…d implementations Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <[email protected]>

…l config Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

…-map Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

…ss facade implementations Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

…adeMap for consistency Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

… and encapsulatedArray for clarity in mutable facade implementations Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

…-config-logic-so-the-components-names-are-always-unique-change-logic-from-hard-delete-to-soft-delete-for-components # Conflicts: # src/core/config/remote/common-flags-data-wrapper.ts # src/core/config/remote/interfaces/remote-config-common-flags-struct.ts # src/core/config/remote/interfaces/remote-config-metadata-struct.ts # src/core/config/remote/metadata.ts # src/core/config/remote/remote-config-manager.ts # src/core/config/remote/remote-config-validator.ts # test/e2e/integration/core/remote-config-validator.test.ts # test/unit/core/config/remote/metadata.test.ts # test/unit/data/schema/migration/impl/remote/remote-config-v1-migration.test.ts

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

…-refactor-remote-config-logic-so-the-components-names-are-always-unique-change-logic-from-hard-delete-to-soft-delete-for-components # Conflicts: # src/commands/deployment.ts # src/commands/explorer.ts # src/commands/network.ts # src/commands/node/configs.ts # src/commands/node/tasks.ts # src/commands/relay.ts # src/core/account-manager.ts # src/core/config/remote/interfaces/migration-struct.ts # src/core/config/remote/interfaces/remote-config-metadata-struct.ts # src/core/config/remote/metadata.ts # src/core/config/remote/migration.ts # src/core/config/remote/remote-config-manager.ts # src/core/config/remote/remote-config-validator.ts # src/core/middlewares.ts # src/core/profile-manager.ts # src/data/configuration/impl/remote-config-source.ts # src/data/schema/model/local/deployment-schema.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/remote-config-metadata.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/remote-config.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/block-node-state-schema.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/consensus-node-state-schema.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/envoy-proxy-state-schema.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/explorer-state-schema.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/haproxy-state-schema.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/mirror-node-state.ts # src/data/schema/model/remote/state/relay-node-state-schema.ts # test/e2e/commands/dual-cluster-full.test.ts # test/e2e/integration/core/remote-config-validator.test.ts # test/test-utility.ts # test/unit/commands/base.test.ts # test/unit/commands/network.test.ts # test/unit/core/config/remote/metadata.test.ts # test/unit/core/config/remote/migration.test.ts # test/unit/data/schema/migration/impl/remote/remote-config-v1-migration.test.ts

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

instamenta added 7 commits April 15, 2025 10:33

extracted most logic from other branch

e82d0ef

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

changes from parent branch

fa7c866

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

removing noise

f17cb00

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

removing block-node related logic

80d1b2c

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

removing block node logic

a441a79

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

cleanup

3292683

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

instamenta self-assigned this Apr 15, 2025

instamenta linked an issue Apr 15, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request

refactor remote config logic so the components name's are always unique, change logic from hard delete to soft delete for components #1822

Open

instamenta marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 09:04

instamenta requested review from a team as code owners April 15, 2025 09:04

instamenta requested review from matteriben and nathanklick April 15, 2025 09:04

instamenta added the PR: Needs Manager Approval A pull request that needs review from a manager. label Apr 15, 2025

instamenta requested a review from jeromy-cannon April 15, 2025 09:04

instamenta added 6 commits April 16, 2025 12:41

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into 01822-refactor-remote…

d5e0f8f

…-config-logic-so-the-components-names-are-always-unique-change-logic-from-hard-delete-to-soft-delete-for-components

removed state field from remote config components

04a98e0

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

adjust tests

35cdc64

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

changed disableComponent method with removeComponent and used it accc…

6caf9e2

…ross commands' Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fix tests for ComponentsDataWrapper

41e392d

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

added new field phase to all components, renamed consensusNodeAliases…

7ed7479

… on RelayComponent to consensusNodeIds, removed nodeStates on ConsensusNodeComponent Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

instamenta added Blocked Further development work is blocked by other item and removed PR: Needs Manager Approval A pull request that needs review from a manager. labels Apr 16, 2025

instamenta and others added 30 commits May 12, 2025 09:12

take changes from branch about remote config migration

0e18795

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

finishing logic for managing the configmaps and writing to all clusters

31952c1

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

lint-fix

cfc6f89

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fix tests

56af03e

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fixed lint errors

e5d6ee7

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fix merge issues

bff289e

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

instantiate empty stringified json object for the configmap key and l…

de5004c

…oad() the source Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

add optional value for the remote config source to inject a model

3d219c7

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

refactor: split local config runtime state into appropriately shielde…

776d00d

…d implementations Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <[email protected]>

fix: resolve test failures

4ae0f88

Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <[email protected]>

fix: resolve test failures

4f26df3

Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <[email protected]>

fix: resolve remote config loading errors

a295cfb

Signed-off-by: Nathan Klick <[email protected]>

fix: ensure existing cluster context is retrieved correctly from loca…

6cab647

…l config Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

refactor: rename constructor parameters for clarity in mutable-backed…

7540ff1

…-map Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

test: add unit tests for StringFacade functionality

47c251a

Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

refactor: rename backingObject to encapsulatedObject for clarity acro…

5c95181

…ss facade implementations Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

refactor: rename BackedArrayList and BackedMap to FacadeArray and Fac…

2c2996f

…adeMap for consistency Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

refactor: rename backingObject and backingArray to encapsulatedObject…

43789fc

… and encapsulatedArray for clarity in mutable facade implementations Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <[email protected]>

fix issues after merge

02c92b5

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fixing merge issues

d0ff8b1

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fixing broken imports

5546b5c

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fixing merge issues

cc0627d

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

fixed lint and tsc errors

8a52bd6

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

merge with main

af2eaa4

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

resolving merge issues

731d5f9

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

resolved issues after merge

05ffff4

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

adapting to new structure

532bb2d

Signed-off-by: Zhan Milenkov <[email protected]>

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat(remote-config): add support for multiple components of the same type, and change from hard to soft delete #1846

feat(remote-config): add support for multiple components of the same type, and change from hard to soft delete #1846

instamenta commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codacy-production bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

feat(remote-config): add support for multiple components of the same type, and change from hard to soft delete #1846

Are you sure you want to change the base?

feat(remote-config): add support for multiple components of the same type, and change from hard to soft delete #1846

Conversation

instamenta commented Apr 15, 2025 • edited Loading

Description

Related Issues

Pull request (PR) checklist

Testing

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 • edited Loading

Unit Test Results - Linux

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 • edited Loading

Unit Test Results - Windows

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025

E2E Test Report

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 • edited Loading

E2E Test Report

codacy-production bot commented Apr 15, 2025 • edited Loading

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2025 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

instamenta commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codacy-production bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading