[query] Make pyToDF use long lived temp files (again) #14907
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It is possible that the partition function can outlive the ExecuteContext in TableValue.toDF. Therefore, any temporary files needed for future stages must still be around, so we need to set selfContainedExecution to false for pyToDF.
chrisvittal
changed the title
grohli
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2025
patrick-schultz
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2025
|
It was the py4j backend extensions one #14767 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is possible that the partition function can outlive the ExecuteContext in TableValue.toDF. Therefore, any temporary files needed for future stages must still be around, so we need to set selfContainedExecution to false for pyToDF.
Fixes #Hail Query 0.2 support > MT to parquet throwing FileNotFoundException: Item not found @ 💬 reported by @ch-kr on Zulip.
Security Assessment