Start to stub in categorize section #108
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These stubs will be very helpful for participants to start working on various subsections. At first, I was somewhat confused which text was an initial draft for the review and which was guidelines for the authors. Perhaps use italics for prompts and suggestions?
|
@agitter : totally agree that italics for prompts and suggestions would be most helpful. I'll convert to that (and fix a couple of the markdown issues that CC noted). Thanks! |
|
I added a placeholder for background information on deep learning, which came up in #116. |
|
@agitter : ok - tried to address. Some of the codeclimate issues will take care of themselves as we write and clarify our thoughts (e.g. header length/punctuation). Basically these are all stubs to be replaced. Thanks! |
| ### If this happens, is deep learning required for any of it? Are we any closer | ||
| ### because of the advent of deep learning? | ||
|
|
||
| * "Categorize" and "treat" sound a bit like PMI goals. Another way to think |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think you meant to bullet this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also, can you expand the acronym for PMI the first time you reference it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bullets here (and elsewhere) seem to be induced by atom's convenient "reflow selection" functionality. I tracked it down here and in the other part, and expanded PMI. Thanks!
| Intro goes here. | ||
| ### Potential writing prompt | ||
|
|
||
| One potential future that we could imagine is a world in which data, once |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I definitely agree with the three subcategories and the content of this stub.
But, for consistency, can you mention them either before or after the period? Right now I am not sure which sentences (CATEGORIZE) or (TREAT) are referencing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gwaygenomics : removed them for now. We'll see how the sections come along to decide what to talk about specifically.
|
My comments have been addressed |
|
@gwaygenomics : let me know if I've addressed all of your comments! thanks! |
Start to stub in categorize section
Fix upstream issues: Extra brackets around citations in figure captions jgm/pandoc#4272 WeasyPrint 0.42 gets stuck Kozea/WeasyPrint#560 Updated pandoc-xnos with better semantic versioning tomduck/pandoc-fignos#46
Includes chunks that someone can bite off if they want to focus on a specific area for writing.