Update config options for windows_exporter process collector

[jaco-vanzyl]

PR Description

The process.iis argument can now be passed to the process collector to enable IIS process name queries.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Notes to the Reviewer

PR Checklist

• CHANGELOG.md updated
• Documentation added
• Tests updated
• Config converters updated

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[jaco-vanzyl]

Hi @clayton-cornell I am unsure why the linux build failed as it is unrelated to the changes I am introducing to the Alloy agent. Would this failure require a new issue to be opened or will you be able to assist with clearing the blocker? I have also signed the CLA and I am not entirely sure why it wouldn't update on the PR.

[dehaansa]

Hi @clayton-cornell I am unsure why the linux build failed as it is unrelated to the changes I am introducing to the Alloy agent. Would this failure require a new issue to be opened or will you be able to assist with clearing the blocker? I have also signed the CLA and I am not entirely sure why it wouldn't update on the PR.

1. I've restarted the tests, to see if it's a flaky test. If not, I'll be sure to make a separate issue to track it.
2. The CLA was recently reset, if you haven't signed it in the past few weeks it will require re-signing, sorry!

[jaco-vanzyl]

Hi @clayton-cornell I am unsure why the linux build failed as it is unrelated to the changes I am introducing to the Alloy agent. Would this failure require a new issue to be opened or will you be able to assist with clearing the blocker? I have also signed the CLA and I am not entirely sure why it wouldn't update on the PR.

1. I've restarted the tests, to see if it's a flaky test. If not, I'll be sure to make a separate issue to track it.
2. The CLA was recently reset, if you haven't signed it in the past few weeks it will require re-signing, sorry!

Thanks for looking into the test failure.

CLA was definitely signed. I think only a maintainer might be able to rerun the CLA check.
You have agreed to the CLA for grafana/alloy
Version: 2021-04-20

[dehaansa]

CLA was definitely signed. I think only a maintainer might be able to rerun the CLA check. You have agreed to the CLA for grafana/alloy Version: 2021-04-20

It appears the commit is associated with a different github user (@\jaco-van-zyl-derivco) than the PR (@\jaco-vanzyl). Perhaps you committed with a different email than the account you've signed in to the github UI with?

[jaco-vanzyl]

CLA was definitely signed. I think only a maintainer might be able to rerun the CLA check. You have agreed to the CLA for grafana/alloy Version: 2021-04-20

It appears the commit is associated with a different github user (@\jaco-van-zyl-derivco) than the PR (@\jaco-vanzyl). Perhaps you committed with a different email than the account you've signed in to the github UI with?

Thanks for the spot, seems I got my creds mixed up when I committed, all signed and ready to go :)

[jaco-vanzyl]

@clayton-cornell could you please assist with a final check?

[clayton-cornell]

Approving for docs

[clayton-cornell]

@dehaansa Over to you or the team for technical review.