-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
pkg/subsystem/linux: adjust s390 subsystems #5838
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
(it should probably be also duplicated to the email thread, but let's discuss it here first) We list only one maintainer because of the current logic that merges several syzkaller/pkg/subsystem/linux/subsystems.go Lines 233 to 244 in e282667
E.g. for
It would be best if we could come up with a less strict yet generic rule to avoid hardcoding the right set of maintainers.
That should be straightforward - we only need to add a record to syzkaller/pkg/subsystem/linux/rules.go Line 91 in e282667
|
It doesn't have its own mailing list, so needs to be defined manually. See google#5838.
It doesn't have its own mailing list, so needs to be defined manually. See #5838.
For s390, the code snippet from the comment above intersects the maintainer lists because of
They both have the same Or we just hard-code it for s390. |
Feature request from Heiko Carstens:
https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller/c/0A_vhmUTaos/m/Rs4uE3upAAAJ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: