Add Intel One Mono

[MatthewTurrini]

Font Project Git Repo URL:
https://github.com/intel/intel-one-mono

Super short description of the Font Family:
Intel One Mono is an expressive monospaced font family that’s built with clarity, legibility, and the needs of developers in mind.

Requirements:

I understand that Google Fonts will publish only fonts that matches its requirements, and I can confirm the project meets them (by ticking the cases, or putting x between the square brackets in text mode):

• The entire font project is licensed under the OFL
• There is no "Reserved Font Name" mention in the OFL license Intel has given OFL RFN permission to Google
• Family name is unique according to namecheck.fontdata.com
• The font supports at least GF Latin Core glyphset
• The repository respect the upstream repo structure
• The source files are available in the repository
• I read, agree and comply with the full contributing requirements
• I am the author of the font or the author agreed to this submission
• I will maintain the repository

Image:

Attach here a pic or a screenshot of the font; one is enough, it can be few letters, to give a quick overview.

[MatthewTurrini]

I was a little confused by the RNF requirement. I thought by leaving the actual reserved font name out of the license text I was in line with your requirements. What do you suggest?

Also, the SIL open license FAQs encourage the use of RFNs:

5.6 Do I, as an author, have to identify any Reserved Font Names?
No. RFNs are optional and not required, but we encourage you to use them. This is primarily to avoid confusion between your work and Modified Versions. As an author you can release a font under the OFL and not declare any Reserved Font Names. There may be situations where you find that using no RFNs and letting your font be changed and modified - including any kind of modification - without having to change the original name is desirable. However you need to be fully aware of the consequences. There will be no direct way for end-users and other designers to distinguish your Original Version from many Modified Versions that may be created.

[davelab6]

I confirm Intel has given OFL RFN permission to Google, so onboarding can proceed.

@MatthewTurrini The RFN is stated in the copyright notice, and should be included everywhere the notice exists. As to wy Google Fonts recommends against using RFNs and using Trademarks instead - briefly: The OFL FAQ was written over 15 years ago, before web fonts. Subsetting fonts is given as an example of a modification that requires renaming or additional permission elsewhere in the OFL FAQ. Subsetting is now common with web fonts. Therefore, I think is probably undesirable generally for people who want their chosen family name to be used widely to assert an RFN. This is explained in more detail in https://googlefonts.github.io/gf-guide/license-file.html