Skip to content

Stormware's Pohoda schema ready #191

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Vitexus
Copy link
Contributor

@Vitexus Vitexus commented Apr 18, 2025

Huge & Complex schema https://www.stormware.cz/xml/schema/all_schema_ver2.zip

accountancy.xsd
accountingFormOfPayment.xsd
accountingSalesVouchers.xsd
accountingunit.xsd
actionPrice.xsd
activity.xsd
addressbook.xsd
advancePartFulfilment.xsd
archive.xsd
automaticLiquidation.xsd
balance.xsd
bankAccount.xsd
bank.xsd
cashRegister.xsd
category.xsd
centre.xsd
classificationVAT.xsd
contract.xsd
data-package.xsd
data.xsd
discount.xsd
documentresponse.xsd
enquiry.xsd
establishment.xsd
filter.xsd
GDPR.xsd
groupStocks.xsd
individualPrice.xsd
intDoc.xsd
intParam.xsd
inventoryLists.xsd
invoice.xsd
isdoc.xsd
liquidationWithoutLink.xsd
list_activity.xsd
list_addBook.xsd
list_centre.xsd
list_contract.xsd
list_stock.xsd
list.xsd
lock.xsd
mKasa.xsd
movement.xsd
numericalSeries.xsd
offer.xsd
order.xsd
parameter.xsd
payment.xsd
prevodka.xsd
prijemka.xsd
print.xsd
prodejka.xsd
productRequirement.xsd
recyclingContrib.xsd
registrationNumber.xsd
response.xsd
rulesPairing.xsd
sendEET.xsd
service.xsd
stock.xsd
storage.xsd
store.xsd
supplier.xsd
type.xsd
userAgenda.xsd
voucher.xsd
vydejka.xsd
vyroba.xsd

@goetas
Copy link
Member

goetas commented Apr 18, 2025

could you add tests for your changes?

@Vitexus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Vitexus commented Apr 18, 2025

could you add tests for your changes?

If my proposed addition to the library is okay, I will be happy to add the phpunit tests as well.

@goetas
Copy link
Member

goetas commented Apr 28, 2025

your changes are reasonable. i'm surprised it wasn't already implemented that way

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants