Skip to content

feat: return time of last usage for public keys and access tokens in the api (#34323) #34339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2025

Conversation

GiteaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@GiteaBot GiteaBot commented May 1, 2025

Backport #34323 by @tobiasbp

In the Gitea GUI, the user can see the time that AccessTokens and PublicKeys were last used. This information is not returned by the /users/{username}/tokens and /user/keys endpoints in the API. This PR adds the missing data.

The time of last usage for for tokens & keys seem to be stored in the Updated field of the structs internally. For consistency, I have used the name updated_at for the new field returned by the API. However, for the API user, I don't think that name reflects the data returned, as I believe it is the time of last usage. I propose that we use the name last_used_at instead. Let's hear reviewers opinion on that.

  • PublicKey
    1. last_used_at: string($date-time)
  • AccessToken
    1. created_at: string($date-time) (for parity with public keys)
    2. last_used_at: string($date-time)

Fix #34313

…the api (go-gitea#34323)

In the Gitea GUI, the user can see the time that _AccessTokens_ and
_PublicKeys_ were last used. This information is not returned by the
_/users/{username}/tokens_ and _/user/keys_ endpoints in the API. This
PR adds the missing data.

The time of last usage for for _tokens_ & _keys_ seem to be stored in
the _Updated_ field of the structs internally. For consistency, I have
used the name _updated_at_ for the new field returned by the _API_.
However, for the _API_ user, I don't think that name reflects the data
returned, as I believe it is the time of last usage. I propose that we
use the name _last_used_at_ instead. Let's hear reviewers opinion on
that.

* PublicKey
  1. _last_used_at_: string($date-time)
* AccessToken
  1. _created_at_: string($date-time) (for parity with public keys)
  2. _last_used_at_: string($date-time)

Fix go-gitea#34313
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added modifies/api This PR adds API routes or modifies them modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code labels May 1, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.24.0 milestone May 1, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label May 1, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot requested review from delvh, lafriks and lunny May 1, 2025 18:42
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels May 1, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 1, 2025
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label May 1, 2025
@lunny lunny merged commit 6c5f0af into go-gitea:release/v1.24 May 1, 2025
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label May 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/api This PR adds API routes or modifies them modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants