Skip to content

test: allo & registry integration tests #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

0xnigir1
Copy link
Collaborator

@0xnigir1 0xnigir1 commented Feb 17, 2025

🤖 Linear

Closes GIT-263 GIT-264

Description

We write integration tests for Allo and Registry events on Orchestrator level. We aim at verifying that Processors and DataLoader communication is working correctly. Although these are integration tests, we mock some components (mainly external ones and Repositories)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the system’s event processing capabilities to improve responsiveness and accuracy in handling various operations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Standardized event data handling to ensure consistent and reliable updates, leading to improved stability in profile and role management.

@0xnigir1 0xnigir1 self-assigned this Feb 17, 2025
Copy link

linear bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the integration testing framework for the Orchestrator by adding new test suites for both Allo and Registry event processing. New integration test files simulate event processing using the Vitest framework and verify that appropriate changesets are applied to repositories, manage roles, and log warnings where applicable. Several helper modules have been introduced or enhanced to provide mock implementations of repositories, providers, and event generators. A utility function was also added for monitoring asynchronous processing during tests. Additionally, modifications were made to event handler and type definitions by changing how nonce and metadata values are represented—shifting from bigint to string. These updates affect the testing infrastructure and ensure that events are processed consistently with the revised type definitions across the system.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
packages/data-flow/test/integration/allo.integration.spec.ts (1)

239-317: "PoolMetadataUpdated" event handling is clear, but avoid casting to "unknown as Round".
Currently, mocking the round object uses unknown as Round. As a good-to-have improvement, consider creating a more strongly typed mock object to reflect the real shape of the Round type. This can help prevent type errors from creeping into tests.

packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/testing.ts (1)

3-17: Helpful waiting mechanism for asynchronous event processing.
Using vi.waitFor to confirm both spies have been called is a good approach to stabilize tests. However, if CI environments experience slowdowns, consider increasing the 500ms timeout or the interval to reduce flakiness.

packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/eventFactory.ts (3)

18-56: Add JSDoc documentation for the createTestAlloEvent function.

The function implementation is well-structured, but it's missing JSDoc documentation as required by the coding guidelines.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Creates a test event for the Allo contract with default values.
+ * @template E - The type of Allo event
+ * @param {Object} params - The event parameters
+ * @param {E} params.eventName - The name of the event
+ * @param {EventParams<"Allo", E>} params.params - The event-specific parameters
+ * @param {number} [params.blockNumber] - The block number (defaults to DEFAULT_BLOCK_NUMBER)
+ * @param {TimestampMs} [params.blockTimestamp] - The block timestamp (defaults to DEFAULT_TIMESTAMP_MS)
+ * @param {Address} [params.srcAddress] - The source address (defaults to DEFAULT_SRC_ADDRESS)
+ * @param {number} [params.logIndex] - The log index (defaults to 0)
+ * @param {number} [params.chainId] - The chain ID (defaults to 1)
+ * @param {Address} [params.from] - The from address (defaults to DEFAULT_FROM_ADDRESS)
+ * @param {number} [params.txIndex] - The transaction index (defaults to 0)
+ * @returns {ProcessorEvent<"Allo", AlloEvent>} The created test event
+ */
 export const createTestAlloEvent = <E extends AlloEvent>({

58-94: Add JSDoc documentation for the createTestRegistryEvent function.

Similar to the Allo event factory, this function needs JSDoc documentation.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Creates a test event for the Registry contract with default values.
+ * @template E - The type of Registry event
+ * @param {Object} params - The event parameters
+ * @param {E} params.eventName - The name of the event
+ * @param {EventParams<"Registry", E>} params.params - The event-specific parameters
+ * @param {number} [params.blockNumber] - The block number (defaults to DEFAULT_BLOCK_NUMBER)
+ * @param {TimestampMs} [params.blockTimestamp] - The block timestamp (defaults to DEFAULT_TIMESTAMP_MS)
+ * @param {number} [params.logIndex] - The log index (defaults to 0)
+ * @param {number} [params.chainId] - The chain ID (defaults to 1)
+ * @param {Address} [params.srcAddress] - The source address (defaults to DEFAULT_SRC_ADDRESS)
+ * @param {Address} [params.from] - The from address (defaults to DEFAULT_FROM_ADDRESS)
+ * @param {number} [params.txIndex] - The transaction index (defaults to 0)
+ * @returns {ProcessorEvent<"Registry", RegistryEvent>} The created test event
+ */
 export const createTestRegistryEvent = <E extends RegistryEvent>({

96-135: Add JSDoc documentation for the createTestStrategyEvent function.

The Strategy event factory also needs JSDoc documentation.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Creates a test event for the Strategy contract with default values.
+ * @template E - The type of Strategy event
+ * @param {Object} params - The event parameters
+ * @param {E} params.eventName - The name of the event
+ * @param {EventParams<"Strategy", E>} params.params - The event-specific parameters
+ * @param {number} params.blockNumber - The block number
+ * @param {Address} params.strategyId - The strategy ID
+ * @param {TimestampMs} [params.blockTimestamp] - The block timestamp (defaults to DEFAULT_TIMESTAMP_MS)
+ * @param {number} [params.logIndex] - The log index (defaults to 0)
+ * @param {number} [params.chainId] - The chain ID (defaults to 1)
+ * @param {Address} [params.srcAddress] - The source address (defaults to DEFAULT_SRC_ADDRESS)
+ * @param {Address} [params.from] - The from address (defaults to DEFAULT_FROM_ADDRESS)
+ * @param {number} [params.txIndex] - The transaction index (defaults to 0)
+ * @returns {ProcessorEvent<"Strategy", E>} The created test event
+ */
 export const createTestStrategyEvent = <E extends StrategyEvent>({
packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/dependencies.ts (3)

16-82: Add JSDoc documentation for createMockRepositories.

The function provides comprehensive mocking but lacks documentation.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Creates mock implementations of core repositories for testing.
+ * @returns {Object} Mock repositories with Vi spies for all methods
+ * @property {Object} projectRepository - Mock project repository
+ * @property {Object} roundRepository - Mock round repository
+ * @property {Object} applicationRepository - Mock application repository
+ * @property {Object} donationRepository - Mock donation repository
+ * @property {Object} applicationPayoutRepository - Mock application payout repository
+ * @property {Object} transactionManager - Mock transaction manager
+ */
 export const createMockRepositories = (): Pick<

85-100: Add JSDoc documentation for createMockProviders.

The providers mock implementation needs documentation.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Creates mock implementations of core providers for testing.
+ * @returns {Object} Mock providers
+ * @property {Object} pricingProvider - DummyPricingProvider instance
+ * @property {Object} metadataProvider - Mock metadata provider
+ * @property {Object} evmProvider - Mock EVM provider
+ */
 export const createMockProviders = (): Pick<

120-150: Simplify the strategy registry mock implementation.

The nested map lookup could be simplified using optional chaining.

Consider this simpler implementation:

-        getStrategyId: vi.fn().mockImplementation((chainId: ChainId, strategyAddress: Address) => {
-            const chainIdMap = strategiesMap.get(chainId);
-            if (!chainIdMap) {
-                return undefined;
-            }
-            const strategyId = chainIdMap.get(strategyAddress);
-            if (!strategyId) {
-                return undefined;
-            }
-            return {
-                id: strategyId,
-                address: strategyAddress,
-                chainId: chainId,
-                handled: true,
-            };
-        }),
+        getStrategyId: vi.fn().mockImplementation((chainId: ChainId, strategyAddress: Address) => {
+            const strategyId = strategiesMap.get(chainId)?.get(strategyAddress);
+            return strategyId ? {
+                id: strategyId,
+                address: strategyAddress,
+                chainId,
+                handled: true,
+            } : undefined;
+        }),
packages/processors/test/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.spec.ts (3)

83-83: Improve test description to better convey intent.

The test description could be more descriptive. Consider renaming it to better convey what is being tested.

Apply this diff to improve the test description:

-    it("handles ProfileCreated event and return the correct changeset", async () => {
+    it("returns InsertProject and InsertProjectRole changesets when handling ProfileCreated event", async () => {

143-143: Remove "should" from test description.

According to the coding guidelines, test descriptions should avoid using the word "should".

Apply this diff to improve the test description:

-    it.skip("logs a warning if metadata parsing fails", async () => {
+    it.skip("logs a warning when metadata parsing fails", async () => {

35-77: Extract test setup into helper functions.

The test setup is quite lengthy. Consider extracting the mock setup into helper functions to improve readability and maintainability.

Create a new helper file test/helpers/mockSetup.ts with the following content:

import { ILogger } from "@grants-stack-indexer/shared";
import { vi } from "vitest";

export function createMockLogger(): ILogger {
  return {
    debug: vi.fn(),
    error: vi.fn(),
    info: vi.fn(),
    warn: vi.fn(),
  };
}

export function createMockDependencies(mockedAddress: string) {
  return {
    projectRepository: {
      getPendingProjectRolesByRole: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
    } as unknown as IProjectReadRepository,
    evmProvider: {
      getTransaction: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ from: mockedAddress }),
    } as unknown as EvmProvider,
    pricingProvider: {
      getTokenPrice: vi.fn(),
    } as unknown as IPricingProvider,
    metadataProvider: {
      getMetadata: vi.fn(),
    } as unknown as IMetadataProvider,
    roundRepository: {} as unknown as IRoundReadRepository,
    applicationRepository: {} as unknown as IApplicationReadRepository,
    logger: createMockLogger(),
  };
}

Then simplify the test setup:

-    const logger: ILogger = {
-        debug: vi.fn(),
-        error: vi.fn(),
-        info: vi.fn(),
-        warn: vi.fn(),
-    };
     beforeEach(() => {
-        mockDependencies = {
-            projectRepository: {
-                getPendingProjectRolesByRole: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
-            } as unknown as IProjectReadRepository,
-            evmProvider: {
-                getTransaction: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ from: mockedAddress }),
-            } as unknown as EvmProvider,
-            pricingProvider: {
-                getTokenPrice: vi.fn(),
-            } as unknown as IPricingProvider,
-            metadataProvider: {
-                getMetadata: vi.fn(),
-            } as unknown as IMetadataProvider,
-            roundRepository: {} as unknown as IRoundReadRepository,
-            applicationRepository: {} as unknown as IApplicationReadRepository,
-            logger,
-        };
+        mockDependencies = createMockDependencies(mockedAddress);
     });
packages/data-flow/test/integration/registry.integration.spec.ts (3)

42-47: Enhance test cleanup.

The test cleanup could be more robust by ensuring all mocks are properly restored.

Apply this diff to improve the cleanup:

     afterEach(async () => {
         vi.clearAllMocks();
+        vi.restoreAllMocks();
         abortController.abort();
         await runPromise;
         runPromise = undefined;
+        
+        // Ensure all spies are properly cleaned up
+        Object.values(mocks.dependencies).forEach((dependency) => {
+            Object.values(dependency).forEach((method) => {
+                if (method?.mockRestore) {
+                    method.mockRestore();
+                }
+            });
+        });
     });

29-40: Extract test setup into a helper function.

The test setup could be more concise by extracting the orchestrator initialization into a helper function.

Move the orchestrator initialization to helpers/setup.ts:

export function initializeTestOrchestrator(chainId: ChainId, abortController: AbortController) {
    const res = createTestOrchestrator({
        chainId,
        strategiesMap: DEFAULT_STRATEGY_MAP,
    });

    return {
        orchestrator: res.orchestrator,
        mocks: res.mocks,
        runPromise: undefined,
    };
}

Then simplify the test setup:

     beforeEach(() => {
-        const res = createTestOrchestrator({
-            chainId,
-            strategiesMap: DEFAULT_STRATEGY_MAP,
-        });
-
-        orchestrator = res.orchestrator;
-        mocks = res.mocks;
-
-        abortController = new AbortController();
-        runPromise = undefined;
+        abortController = new AbortController();
+        const setup = initializeTestOrchestrator(chainId, abortController);
+        orchestrator = setup.orchestrator;
+        mocks = setup.mocks;
+        runPromise = setup.runPromise;
     });

392-392: Improve test descriptions for role-related events.

The test descriptions for role-related events could be more descriptive to better convey the test scenarios.

Apply these diffs to improve the test descriptions:

-    it("process RoleGranted event and apply InsertProjectRole changeset when project exists", async () => {
+    it("inserts project role when processing RoleGranted event for existing project", async () => {

-    it("process RoleGranted event and apply InsertPendingProjectRole changeset when project doesn't exist", async () => {
+    it("inserts pending project role when processing RoleGranted event for non-existent project", async () => {

-    it("process RoleRevoked event and apply DeleteAllProjectRolesByRoleAndAddress changeset when project exists", async () => {
+    it("deletes project roles when processing RoleRevoked event for existing project", async () => {

Also applies to: 453-453, 506-506

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 088679d and 6cb8ada.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/allo.integration.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/dependencies.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/eventFactory.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/setup.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/testing.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/registry.integration.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/processors/src/processors/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/processors/test/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/shared/src/types/events/registry.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.ts`: Review TypeScript files for adherence to the fo...

**/*.ts: Review TypeScript files for adherence to the following guidelines:
- Avoid over-abstraction; prioritize composition over inheritance.
- Use dependency injection and follow SOLID principles.
- Avoid any; use unknown when necessary.
- Use runtime type-checking for environment variables (e.g., Zod).
- Prevent circular dependencies with the internal module pattern.
- Libraries should have an external.ts file explicitly listing public exports.
- Use bigint as-is; cast to Number only when exposing values via APIs.
- Document all code with JSDoc.
- Encourage static async factory functions for constructors.

  • Avoid overly nitpicky feedback beyond these best practices.
  • packages/processors/src/processors/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.ts
  • packages/processors/test/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.spec.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/setup.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/dependencies.ts
  • packages/shared/src/types/events/registry.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/registry.integration.spec.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/allo.integration.spec.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/eventFactory.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/testing.ts
`**/*.spec.ts`: Review the unit test files with the followin...

**/*.spec.ts: Review the unit test files with the following guidelines:
- Avoid using the word "should" in test descriptions.
- Ensure descriptive test names convey the intent of each test.
- Validate adherence to the Mocha/Chai/Jest test library best practices.

  • Be concise and avoid overly nitpicky feedback outside of these best practices.
  • packages/processors/test/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.spec.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/registry.integration.spec.ts
  • packages/data-flow/test/integration/allo.integration.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/data-flow/test/integration/allo.integration.spec.ts (4)

1-2: Imports and dependencies look well-organized.
No issues detected with importing from viem and vitest. The chosen approach facilitates straightforward test setup.


19-54: Efficient use of beforeEach and afterEach blocks.
The approach to reset mocks and abort the controller in each test run is clear, preventing cross-test pollution. This test setup is well-structured.


56-174: Comprehensive test for "PoolCreated" event.
The test thoroughly verifies calls to spies, database operations, and final state checks. Great job mocking the round repository and ensuring the correct parameters for all changesets (InsertRound, InsertRoundRole, DeletePendingRoundRoles).


512-558: Tests for unmatched roles demonstrate negative scenario coverage.
The logic that merely logs a warning instead of applying changesets when no round is found is well-validated. This ensures resilience in unexpected role assignments.

packages/data-flow/test/integration/helpers/setup.ts (1)

18-82: Well-structured creation of a test orchestrator with dependency injection.
This factory utilizes a mock logger, notifier, repositories, and clients, aligning with SOLID principles. It also helps ensure each test can run with a fresh orchestrator instance and stable mocks.

packages/shared/src/types/events/registry.ts (2)

52-54: LGTM! Improved type definitions for blockchain values.

The change from bigint to string with clarifying comments about the underlying Solidity types (uint256) improves type safety and aligns with blockchain best practices.


60-60: LGTM! Consistent type representation.

The metadata protocol type change maintains consistency with the updated type definitions.

packages/processors/src/processors/registry/handlers/profileCreated.handler.ts (1)

62-62: LGTM! Proper type conversion for nonce value.

The change correctly converts the string nonce to BigInt, aligning with the updated type definitions while maintaining proper data handling.

Copy link
Contributor

@0xkenj1 0xkenj1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks so god and clean, gj ! Just small comment

chainId?: number;
from?: Address;
txIndex?: number;
}): ProcessorEvent<"Allo", AlloEvent> => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should it be :

Suggested change
}): ProcessorEvent<"Allo", AlloEvent> => {
}): ProcessorEvent<"Allo", E> => {

??

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thx good catch!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

srcAddress?: Address;
from?: Address;
txIndex?: number;
}): ProcessorEvent<"Registry", RegistryEvent> => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

srcAddress?: Address;
from?: Address;
txIndex?: number;
}): ProcessorEvent<"Strategy", E> => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@0xnigir1 0xnigir1 requested a review from 0xkenj1 February 17, 2025 17:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@jahabeebs jahabeebs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻

@0xnigir1 0xnigir1 merged commit c8fd4d0 into dev Feb 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@0xnigir1 0xnigir1 deleted the test/allo-registry-integration branch February 17, 2025 20:36
0xnigir1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
# 🤖 Linear

Closes GIT-265 GIT-262

## Description

Write integration tests for Strategy events on Orchestrator level
(continuation of #67). Also, fix some issues on Registration handler
regarding Date and BlockTimestamp conversion

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
	- Expanded strategy mapping to support additional entries.
- **Refactor**
- Enhanced event handling by making a key parameter optional with a
default value.
- Refined timestamp processing to ensure consistent and accurate date
representations.
- **Tests**
- Introduced new integration tests to validate and monitor strategy
event processing and time accuracy.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
0xkenj1 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
# 🤖 Linear

Closes GIT-265 GIT-262

## Description

Write integration tests for Strategy events on Orchestrator level
(continuation of #67). Also, fix some issues on Registration handler
regarding Date and BlockTimestamp conversion

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
	- Expanded strategy mapping to support additional entries.
- **Refactor**
- Enhanced event handling by making a key parameter optional with a
default value.
- Refined timestamp processing to ensure consistent and accurate date
representations.
- **Tests**
- Introduced new integration tests to validate and monitor strategy
event processing and time accuracy.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants