Skip to content

Traces sample rate default change #4335

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

antonpirker
Copy link
Member

Revert changing the default of traces_sample_rate done in #4240

@antonpirker antonpirker changed the base branch from master to potel-base April 28, 2025 14:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.36%. Comparing base (a5d0f01) to head (8ed0782).
Report is 1 commits behind head on potel-base.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           potel-base    #4335      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       84.42%   84.36%   -0.07%     
==============================================
  Files             144      144              
  Lines           14636    14636              
  Branches         2327     2327              
==============================================
- Hits            12357    12348       -9     
- Misses           1553     1560       +7     
- Partials          726      728       +2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
sentry_sdk/consts.py 99.54% <ø> (ø)

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

@antonpirker antonpirker marked this pull request as ready for review April 28, 2025 15:10
@antonpirker antonpirker requested a review from a team as a code owner April 28, 2025 15:10
@antonpirker antonpirker merged commit 35fab6b into potel-base Apr 29, 2025
129 checks passed
@antonpirker antonpirker deleted the antonpirker/potel/revert-traces-sample-rate-default-change branch April 29, 2025 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants