Skip to content

Slim and alpine dependency updates in base ruby images #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

@rubys rubys linked an issue Jan 14, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@albus522
Copy link
Collaborator

Is it worth attempting to auto-detect for the ffi gem and re-add libffi-dev ?

@rubys
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rubys commented Jan 14, 2025

Is it worth attempting to auto-detect for the ffi gem and re-add libffi-dev ?

Certainly. It is likely that we will be playing whack-a-mole for a while as these dependencies are discovered, but that's fine; the changes are straightforward and new releases can be cut frequently.

@rubys rubys merged commit 36cde77 into main Jan 14, 2025
8 checks passed
packages += @@packages["build"] if @@packages["build"]
packages += %w(nodejs npm) if (node_version == "lts") && (not using_execjs?)
packages << "libyaml-dev" if options.fullstaq?
packages << "libffi-dev" if @@packages["ffi"]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should have been @gemfile.include?("ffi")

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. Fixed in #132

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Slim and alpine dependency updates in base ruby images
2 participants