Skip to content

chore: link to older docs site #987

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 23, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Shinigami92
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 added c: docs Improvements or additions to documentation p: 1-normal Nothing urgent s: accepted Accepted feature / Confirmed bug labels May 23, 2022
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 self-assigned this May 23, 2022
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 requested a review from a team May 23, 2022 19:15
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2022 19:15
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #987 (6e88f77) into main (a72f3d8) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #987   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.67%   99.67%           
=======================================
  Files        2110     2110           
  Lines      225732   225732           
  Branches      978      978           
=======================================
  Hits       224989   224989           
  Misses        723      723           
  Partials       20       20           

@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 merged commit e204cfa into main May 23, 2022
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 deleted the docs-link-to-older-doc-site branch May 23, 2022 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c: docs Improvements or additions to documentation p: 1-normal Nothing urgent s: accepted Accepted feature / Confirmed bug
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants