Skip to content

chore(deps): update devdependencies #1462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2022
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 17, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/validator (source) ~13.7.7 -> ~13.7.8 age adoption passing confidence
esbuild ~0.15.10 -> ~0.15.11 age adoption passing confidence
vite (source) ~3.1.7 -> ~3.1.8 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild

v0.15.11

Compare Source

  • Fix various edge cases regarding template tags and this (#​2610)

    This release fixes some bugs where the value of this wasn't correctly preserved when evaluating template tags in a few edge cases. These edge cases are listed below:

    async function test() {
      class Foo { foo() { return this } }
      class Bar extends Foo {
        a = async () => super.foo``
        b = async () => super['foo']``
        c = async (foo) => super[foo]``
      }
      function foo() { return this }
      const obj = { foo }
      const bar = new Bar
      console.log(
        (await bar.a()) === bar,
        (await bar.b()) === bar,
        (await bar.c('foo')) === bar,
        { foo }.foo``.foo === foo,
        (true && obj.foo)`` !== obj,
        (false || obj.foo)`` !== obj,
        (null ?? obj.foo)`` !== obj,
      )
    }
    test()

    Each edge case in the code above previously incorrectly printed false when run through esbuild with --minify --target=es6 but now correctly prints true. These edge cases are unlikely to have affected real-world code.

vitejs/vite

v3.1.8

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2022 00:15
@renovate renovate bot added the c: dependencies Pull requests that adds/updates a dependency label Oct 17, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1462 (88086bf) into next (2b7ed02) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next    #1462   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.63%   99.63%           
=======================================
  Files        2164     2164           
  Lines      236852   236852           
  Branches     1002     1002           
=======================================
  Hits       235977   235977           
  Misses        854      854           
  Partials       21       21           

@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2022 07:09
Shinigami92
Shinigami92 previously approved these changes Oct 17, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/devdependencies branch from e5d0778 to 88086bf Compare October 17, 2022 09:20
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 merged commit 95eff41 into next Oct 17, 2022
@Shinigami92 Shinigami92 deleted the renovate/devdependencies branch October 17, 2022 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c: dependencies Pull requests that adds/updates a dependency
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants