Skip to content

inline tab name broken #221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2022
Merged

inline tab name broken #221

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2022

Conversation

VaZark
Copy link
Contributor

@VaZark VaZark commented Dec 2, 2022

Hello @fabiocaccamo ,

Looks like the inline forms' tab name was accidentally overwritten in a commit after the merge (967f582).

Just a quick fix.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 94.60% // Head: 94.60% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (13338fb) compared to base (9c0251b).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #221   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.60%   94.60%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines         426      426           
=======================================
  Hits          403      403           
  Misses         23       23           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@fabiocaccamo fabiocaccamo merged commit 333025f into fabiocaccamo:master Dec 2, 2022
@VaZark VaZark deleted the inlines-missing branch December 2, 2022 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants