Skip to content

Cache the key backup status whether enabled or not #29886

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

andybalaam
Copy link
Member

Part of #29231

Tidy up key backup status in DeviceListener a little, making it easier to find out about key backup status, which we will do in later changes.

Includes a small change to behaviour: always cache the answer, instead of only caching it when the answer was true. I can't see a way that this will cause problems, but if the reviewer can, it is simple to change it back to only caching positive answers.

@andybalaam andybalaam force-pushed the andybalaam/cache-key-backup-status-in-device-listener branch from 4c9550b to bf0ca75 Compare May 7, 2025 08:27
@andybalaam andybalaam enabled auto-merge May 7, 2025 08:27
@andybalaam andybalaam added this pull request to the merge queue May 7, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks May 7, 2025
@andybalaam andybalaam added this pull request to the merge queue May 7, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks May 7, 2025
@andybalaam andybalaam added this pull request to the merge queue May 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 6063209 May 7, 2025
33 checks passed
@andybalaam andybalaam deleted the andybalaam/cache-key-backup-status-in-device-listener branch May 7, 2025 11:40
parsatorb pushed a commit to iluvatar-tech/element-web that referenced this pull request May 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-Task Tasks for the team like planning
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants